*       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

      @Override
      public @Nullable Object[] toArray() {
        return ObjectArrays.toArrayImpl(this);
      }

      @Override
      @SuppressWarnings("nullness") // b/192354773 in our checker affects toArray declarations
      public <T extends @Nullable Object> T[] toArray(T[] a) {
        return ObjectArrays.toArrayImpl(this, a);
      }

      @Override
      public Spliterator<K> spliterator() {

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

   *
   * <p>The returned array has all its elements set to their initial null values. However, we don't
   * declare it as {@code @Nullable ImmutableMapEntry[]} because our checker doesn't require newly
   * created arrays to have a {@code @Nullable} element type even when they're created directly with
   * {@code new ImmutableMapEntry[...]}, so it seems silly to insist on that only here.
   */

# Note: this is excluded on the full code base, since any submitted code must
# have passed Google's internal style guidelines.
@test "Check formatting for C++ files" {
    skip "clang-format doesn't match internal clang-format checker"
    echo "clang-format is recommended. Here are the suggested changes:"
    echo "============================="
    grep -e '\.h$' -e '\.cc$' $BATS_FILE_TMPDIR/changed_files > $BATS_TEST_TMPDIR/files || true

    return Multisets.iteratorImpl(this);
  }

  @Override
  public @Nullable Object[] toArray() {
    return standardToArray();
  }

  @Override
  @SuppressWarnings("nullness") // b/192354773 in our checker affects toArray declarations
  public <T extends @Nullable Object> T[] toArray(T[] array) {
    return standardToArray(array);
  }

  @Override
  public String toString() {
    return entrySet().toString();

    clearCache();
    backingMap.clear();
  }

  @Nullable V get(Object key) {
    checkNotNull(key);
    V value = getIfCached(key);
    // TODO(b/192579700): Use a ternary once it no longer confuses our nullness checker.
    if (value == null) {
      return getWithoutCaching(key);
    } else {
      return value;
    }
  }

  final @Nullable V getWithoutCaching(Object key) {
    checkNotNull(key);

 */
@GwtCompatible
public class ExecutionError extends Error {
  /*
   * Ideally, this class would have exposed only constructors that require a non-null cause. See
   * https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify-reference-checker/blob/61aafa4ae52594830cfc2d61c8b113009dbdb045/src/main/java/com/google/jspecify/nullness/NullSpecTransfer.java#L789
   * and https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify/issues/490.
   *

    }

    @Override
    public E intern(E sample) {
      while (true) {
        // trying to read the canonical...
        @SuppressWarnings("rawtypes") // using raw types to avoid a bug in our nullness checker :(
        InternalEntry entry = map.getEntry(sample);
        if (entry != null) {
          Object canonical = entry.getKey();
          if (canonical != null) { // only matters if weak/soft keys are used