with Java.

We spent a lot of time and energy on retaining strict compatibility with OkHttp 3.x. We’re even
keeping the package name the same: `okhttp3`!

There are three kinds of compatibility we’re tracking:

 * **Binary compatibility** is the ability to compile a program against OkHttp 3.x, and then to run
   it against OkHttp 4.x. We’re using the excellent [japicmp][japicmp] library via its

import java.util.List;
import org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable;
import org.junit.Ignore;

/**
 * Tester to make sure the {@code iterator().remove()} implementation of {@code Multiset} works when
 * there are multiple occurrences of elements.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@GwtCompatible(emulated = true)
@Ignore // Affects only Android test runner, which respects JUnit 4 annotations on JUnit 3 tests.

   * {@link MoreExecutors#directExecutor}. Normally, when the first future completes, all the other
   * tasks would be called recursively. Here, we detect that the delegate executor is executing
   * inline, and maintain a queue to dispatch tasks iteratively. There is one instance of this class
   * per call to submit() or submitAsync(), and each instance supports only one call to execute().
   *

import okio.BufferedSource
import okio.ByteString
import okio.ForwardingSource
import okio.Source
import okio.buffer

/**
 * Streaming decoder of data encoded following Abstract Syntax Notation One (ASN.1). There are
 * multiple variants of ASN.1, including:
 *
 *  * DER: Distinguished Encoding Rules. This further constrains ASN.1 for deterministic encoding.
 *  * BER: Basic Encoding Rules.
 *

#       options in "$@", and eventually passing that to Java.
#
#       Where the inherited environment variables (DEFAULT_JVM_OPTS, JAVA_OPTS,
#       and GRADLE_OPTS) rely on word-splitting, this is performed explicitly;
#       see the in-line comments for details.
#
#       There are tweaks for specific operating systems such as AIX, CygWin,
#       Darwin, MinGW, and NonStop.
#

      // Some Android 5.0.x Samsung devices have bugs in JDK reflection APIs that cause
      // getDeclaredField to throw a NoSuchFieldException when the field is definitely there.
      // For these users fallback to a suboptimal implementation, based on synchronized. This will
      // be a definite performance hit to those users.
      thrownReflectionFailure = reflectionFailure;

     * For example,
     * <pre>maven.relocations.entries = org.foo:*:*>, \\<br/>    org.here:*:*>org.there:*:*, \\<br/>    javax.inject:javax.inject:1>>jakarta.inject:jakarta.inject:1.0.5</pre>
     * means: 3 entries, ban <code>org.foo group</code> (exactly, so <code>org.foo.bar</code> is allowed),
     * relocate <code>org.here</code> to <code>org.there</code> and finally globally relocate (see <code>&gt;&gt;</code> above)

    arraycopy(contents, 0, result, 0, contents.length);
    return result;
  }

  /*
   * a "type A" unmodifiable collection freaks out proactively, even if there
   * wasn't going to be any actual work to do anyway
   */

  @Override
  public boolean addAll(Collection<? extends E> elementsToAdd) {
    throw up();
  }

  @Override

MINIO_ETCD_COMMENT          (sentence)  optionally add a comment to this setting
```

### API

By default, there is no limitation on the number of concurrent requests that a server/cluster processes at the same time. However, it is possible to impose such limitation using the API subsystem. Read more about throttling limitation in MinIO server [here](https://github.com/minio/minio/blob/master/docs/throttle/README.md).

```
KEY:

carefully. Because of this, if you're interested in seeing a new feature in
Guava, the best approach is to create an [issue][] (or comment on an existing
issue if there is one) requesting the feature and describing specific use cases
for it.

If the feature has merit, it will go through a thorough process of API design
and review. Any code should come after this.