if not user_dict:
        raise HTTPException(status_code=400, detail="Incorrect username or password")
    user = UserInDB(**user_dict)
    hashed_password = fake_hash_password(form_data.password)
    if not hashed_password == user.hashed_password:
        raise HTTPException(status_code=400, detail="Incorrect username or password")

    return {"access_token": user.username, "token_type": "bearer"}

Складний приклад строкових літералів у фрагментах коду: `f"I like {'oranges' if orange else "apples"}"`

Хардкор: `Yesterday, my friend wrote: "If you spell incorrectly correctly, you have spelled it incorrectly". To which I answered: "Correct, but 'incorrectly' is incorrectly not '"incorrectly"'"`

////

//// tab | Інформація

... Однак лапки всередині фрагментів коду мають залишатися як є.

////

## Блоки коду { #code-blocks }

Um exemplo difícil de literais de string em trechos de código: `f"I like {'oranges' if orange else "apples"}"`

Pesado: `Yesterday, my friend wrote: "If you spell incorrectly correctly, you have spelled it incorrectly". To which I answered: "Correct, but 'incorrectly' is incorrectly not '"incorrectly"'"`

////

//// tab | Informação

... No entanto, as aspas dentro de trechos de código devem permanecer como estão.

////

그런데 공격자들이 사용자명을 `stanleyjobsox`, 비밀번호를 `love123`으로 다시 시도합니다.

그러면 애플리케이션 코드는 다음과 비슷하게 동작합니다:

```Python
if "stanleyjobsox" == "stanleyjobson" and "love123" == "swordfish":
    ...
```

Python은 두 문자열이 같지 않다는 것을 알아차리기 전까지 `stanleyjobsox`와 `stanleyjobson` 양쪽의 `stanleyjobso` 전체를 비교해야 합니다. 그래서 "Incorrect username or password"라고 응답하기까지 추가로 몇 마이크로초가 더 걸릴 것입니다.

            "A device attached to the system is not functioning.", "Incorrect function.", "The parameter is incorrect.",
            "Invalid access to memory location.", "The handle is invalid.", "The parameter is incorrect.",
            "The system cannot find the file specified.", "The system cannot find the file specified.", "End of file",

////

## Quotes { #quotes }

//// tab | Test

Yesterday, my friend wrote: "If you spell incorrectly correctly, you have spelled it incorrectly". To which I answered: "Correct, but 'incorrectly' is incorrectly not '"incorrectly"'".

/// note

The LLM will probably translate this wrong. Interesting is only if it keeps the fixed translation when retranslating.

///

////

				`comment="really long comment"`:                {},
			},
		},
		// Incorrect delimiter, expected fields should be empty.
		{
			input:          `comment:"really long comment" connection_string:"host=localhost port=2832"`,
			keys:           []string{"connection_string", "comment"},
			expectedFields: map[string]struct{}{},
		},
		// Incorrect type of input v/s required keys.
		{

constraints.LuhnCheck.message = The Luhn Modulo 11 checksum of {value} is incorrect.
constraints.Mod10Check.message = The Modulo 10 checksum of {value} is incorrect.
constraints.Mod11Check.message = The Modulo 11 checksum of {value} is incorrect.
constraints.ModCheck.message = The {modType} checksum of {value} is incorrect.
constraints.NotBlank.message = {item} is required.
constraints.NotEmpty.message = {item} is required.

constraints.LuhnCheck.message = The Luhn Modulo 11 checksum of {value} is incorrect.
constraints.Mod10Check.message = The Modulo 10 checksum of {value} is incorrect.
constraints.Mod11Check.message = The Modulo 11 checksum of {value} is incorrect.
constraints.ModCheck.message = The {modType} checksum of {value} is incorrect.
constraints.NotBlank.message = {item} is required.
constraints.NotEmpty.message = {item} is required.

Сложный пример строковых литералов во фрагментах кода: `f"I like {'oranges' if orange else "apples"}"`

Хардкор: `Yesterday, my friend wrote: "If you spell incorrectly correctly, you have spelled it incorrectly". To which I answered: "Correct, but 'incorrectly' is incorrectly not '"incorrectly"'"`

////

//// tab | Информация

... Однако кавычки внутри фрагментов кода должны оставаться как есть.

////