var errSignatureMismatch = errors.New("Signature does not match")

// When upload object size is greater than 5G in a single PUT/POST operation.
var errDataTooLarge = errors.New("Object size larger than allowed limit")

// When upload object size is less than what was expected.
var errDataTooSmall = errors.New("Object size smaller than expected")

// errServerNotInitialized - server not initialized.

  * Fix journalctl leak
  * Fix container memory rss
  * Fix incorrect CPU usage with 4.7 kernel
  * OOM parser uses kmsg
  * Add hugepages support
  * Add CRI-O support

					ModTime:   baseTime.Add(30 * time.Minute).UnixNano(),
					Signature: [4]byte{1, 1, 1, 1},
					Type:      ObjectType,
					Flags:     0,
				}},
			},
		},
		// Delete marker.
		8: {
			versions: []xlMetaV2ShallowVersion{
				{header: xlMetaV2VersionHeader{
					VersionID: [16]byte{7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7, 7},
					ModTime:   baseTime.Add(90 * time.Minute).UnixNano(),

	testCases := []struct {
		inputConfig           string
		expectedParsingErr    error
		expectedValidationErr error
		destBucket            string
		sameTarget            bool
	}{
		{ // 1 Invalid delete marker status in replication config

field, [`Policies`](/pkg/crypto/x509/#Certificate.Policies), which supports
certificate policy OIDs with components larger than 31 bits. By default this
field is only used during parsing, when it is populated with policy OIDs, but
not used during marshaling. It can be used to marshal these larger OIDs, instead
of the existing PolicyIdentifiers field, by using the
[`x509usepolicies` setting.](/pkg/crypto/x509/#CreateCertificate).

		bs.XferRateLrg.addSize(sz, duration)
	} else {
		bs.XferRateSml.addSize(sz, duration)
	}
}

// RMetricName - name of replication metric
type RMetricName string

const (
	// Large - objects larger than 128MiB
	Large RMetricName = "Large"
	// Small - objects smaller than 128MiB
	Small RMetricName = "Small"
	// Total - metric pertaining to totals
	Total RMetricName = "Total"
)

		}

		if err != nil && key != zeroKey {
			t.Errorf("Test %d: parsing failed and client key is not zero key", i)
		}
		if err == nil && key == zeroKey {
			t.Errorf("Test %d: parsed client key is zero key", i)
		}
	}
}

var ssecCopyParseTests = []struct {
	Header      http.Header
	ExpectedErr error
}{
	{
		Header: http.Header{

Then we use the request directly, and extract the body as `bytes`. This means that FastAPI won't even try to parse the request payload as JSON.

And then in our code, we parse that YAML content directly, and then we are again using the same Pydantic model to validate the YAML content:

//// tab | Pydantic v2

```Python hl_lines="26-33"

	// difference that for some j, a[j]>b[j] and a[j+1]<b[j+1]. If the implementation
	// compares large chunks with wrong endianness, it gets wrong result.
	// no vector register is larger than 512 bytes for now
	const maxLength = 512
	a := make([]byte, maxLength)
	b := make([]byte, maxLength)
	// randomish but deterministic data. No 0 or 255.
	for i := 0; i < maxLength; i++ {

    for (int i = 1; i < numKeys; i++) {
      nodes.get(i).checkAcquiredLocks(Policies.THROW, nodes.subList(0, i));
    }
    // Pre-populate all disallowedPriorLocks with nodes of larger ordinal.
    for (int i = 0; i < numKeys - 1; i++) {
      nodes.get(i).checkAcquiredLocks(Policies.DISABLED, nodes.subList(i + 1, numKeys));
    }
    return Collections.unmodifiableMap(map);
  }

  /**