* which contained the following notice:
 *
 * Written by Doug Lea with assistance from members of JCP JSR-166
 * Expert Group and released to the public domain, as explained at
 * http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
 * Other contributors include Andrew Wright, Jeffrey Hayes,
 * Pat Fisher, Mike Judd.
 */

package com.google.common.util.concurrent;

                bufferIndex += ((AndXServerMessageBlock) andx).readAndXWireFormat(buffer, bufferIndex);
            } else {

                /*
                 * Just a plain smb. Read it as normal.
                 */

                buffer[bufferIndex++] = (byte) (andx.wordCount & 0xFF);

                if (andx.wordCount != 0 && andx.wordCount > 2) {

    server.enqueue(MockResponse(body = "a"))
    server.enqueue(MockResponse(body = "b"))
    val request =
      Request(
        url = server.url("/"),
        body = "request body".toRequestBody("text/plain".toMediaType()),
      )
    assertConnectionReused(request, request)
  }

  @Test
  fun connectionsAreReusedWithHttp2() {
    enableHttp2()
    server.enqueue(MockResponse(body = "a"))

   * possible with an unsafe cast which requires {@code keys} to actually be of type {@code K}.
   *
   * @since 11.0
   */
  /*
   * <? extends Object> is mostly the same as <?> to plain Java. But to nullness checkers, they
   * differ: <? extends Object> means "non-null types," while <?> means "all types."
   */
  @Override
  public ImmutableMap<K, V> getAllPresent(Iterable<? extends Object> keys) {

 * can't get by with the standard implementations, prefer to derive a new {@code Future} instance
 * with the methods in {@link Futures} or, if necessary, to extend {@link AbstractFuture}.
 *
 * <p>Occasionally, an API will return a plain {@code Future} and it will be impossible to change
 * the return type. For this case, we provide a more expensive workaround in {@code
 * JdkFutureAdapters}. However, when possible, it is more efficient and reliable to create a {@code

 * can't get by with the standard implementations, prefer to derive a new {@code Future} instance
 * with the methods in {@link Futures} or, if necessary, to extend {@link AbstractFuture}.
 *
 * <p>Occasionally, an API will return a plain {@code Future} and it will be impossible to change
 * the return type. For this case, we provide a more expensive workaround in {@code
 * JdkFutureAdapters}. However, when possible, it is more efficient and reliable to create a {@code

    public Property<String> getSomeProperty() {
        return someProperty
    }
}
```

It is not acceptable to introduce new properties on a task, extension or domain object that use plain getters and setters.  It is also not acceptable to add setters that take a Provider.

   * near-simultaneously) then this is the first reason known to this peer.
   */
  internal var errorCode: ErrorCode? = null
    get() = withLock { field }

  /** The exception that explains [errorCode]. Null if no exception was provided. */
  internal var errorException: IOException? = null

  init {
    if (headers != null) {

If you plan to write assembly language, you should read that document although much of it is Plan 9-specific.
The current document provides a summary of the syntax and the differences with
what is explained in that document, and
describes the peculiarities that apply when writing assembly code to interact with Go.
</p>

<p>

   * possible with an unsafe cast which requires {@code keys} to actually be of type {@code K}.
   *
   * @since 11.0
   */
  /*
   * <? extends Object> is mostly the same as <?> to plain Java. But to nullness checkers, they
   * differ: <? extends Object> means "non-null types," while <?> means "all types."
   */
  @Override
  public ImmutableMap<K, V> getAllPresent(Iterable<? extends Object> keys) {