return file(new File(first), more);
  }

  /** Returns a {@code File} object for the given path parts. */
  private static File file(File first, String... more) {
    // not very efficient, but should definitely be correct
    File file = first;
    for (String name : more) {
      file = new File(file, name);
    }
    return file;
  }

    addEdge(N1, N2, E12);
    addEdge(N1, N2, E12_A);

    assertThat(network.edgesConnecting(N1, N2)).containsExactly(E12, E12_A);
    // Passed nodes should be in the correct edge direction, first is the
    // source node and the second is the target node
    assertThat(network.edgesConnecting(N2, N1)).isEmpty();
  }

  @Test
  public void edgesConnecting_parallelEdges_undirected() {

   *       one with {@link CharSequence#charAt(int)}.
   *   <li>use {@link Appendable#append(CharSequence)} in {@link #copyTo(Appendable)} and {@link
   *       #copyTo(CharSink)}. We know this is correct since strings are immutable and so the length
   *       can't change, and it is faster because many writers and appendables are optimized for
   *       appending string instances.
   * </ul>
   */

	}
	if x&xlFlagInlineData != 0 {
		if s.Len() > 0 {
			s.WriteByte(',')
		}
		s.WriteString("Inline")
	}
	return s.String()
}

// checkXL2V1 will check if the metadata has correct header and is a known major version.
// The remaining payload and versions are returned.
func checkXL2V1(buf []byte) (payload []byte, major, minor uint16, err error) {
	if len(buf) <= 8 {

* Vous pouvez également vérifier s'il existe des traductions pour votre langue et y ajouter une review, ce qui m'aidera à savoir si la traduction est correcte et je pourrai la fusionner.

* Utilisez les mêmes exemples en Python et ne traduisez que le texte des documents. Vous n'avez pas besoin de changer quoi que ce soit pour que cela fonctionne.

	BytesDone   uint64
	BytesFailed uint64

	// Last object scanned.
	Bucket string `json:"-"`
	Object string `json:"-"`

	// Numbers when current bucket started healing,
	// for resuming with correct numbers.
	ResumeItemsHealed  uint64 `json:"-"`
	ResumeItemsFailed  uint64 `json:"-"`
	ResumeItemsSkipped uint64 `json:"-"`
	ResumeBytesDone    uint64 `json:"-"`
	ResumeBytesFailed  uint64 `json:"-"`

			}
			m.addErrorNonBlockingClose(errResp, context.Cause(m.ctx))
			return
		case <-pingTimer:
			errState = !m.doPing(errResp)
		}
	}
}

// checkSeq will check if sequence number is correct and increment it by 1.
func (m *muxClient) checkSeq(seq uint32) (ok bool) {
	if seq != m.RecvSeq {
		if debugPrint {
			fmt.Printf("MuxID: %d client, expected sequence %d, got %d\n", m.MuxID, m.RecvSeq, seq)
		}

   */
  protected abstract I newTargetIterator();

  /**
   * Override this to verify anything after running a list of Stimuli.
   *
   * <p>For example, verify that calls to remove() actually removed the correct elements.
   *
   * @param elements the expected elements passed to the constructor, as mutated by {@code
   *     remove()}, {@code set()}, and {@code add()} calls
   */
  protected void verify(List<E> elements) {}

    return file(new File(first), more);
  }

  /** Returns a {@code File} object for the given path parts. */
  private static File file(File first, String... more) {
    // not very efficient, but should definitely be correct
    File file = first;
    for (String name : more) {
      file = new File(file, name);
    }
    return file;
  }

</p>

<p>
A <i>goroutine execution</i> is modeled as a set of memory operations executed by a single goroutine.
</p>

<p>
<b>Requirement 1</b>:
The memory operations in each goroutine must correspond to a correct sequential execution of that goroutine,
given the values read from and written to memory.
That execution must be consistent with the <i>sequenced before</i> relation,