assertEquals(expectedStatus, ex.getNtStatus(), "status should map based on code");
        assertNull(ex.getCause(), "cause must be null for int constructor");
        assertNull(ex.getRootCause(), "rootCause must be null for int constructor");
    }

    /**
     * Validate message-only constructor with both null and empty messages.
     */
    @ParameterizedTest
    @MethodSource("messageProvider")

  public ImmutableBiMapFloodingTest() {
    super(
        EnumSet.allOf(ConstructionPathway.class).stream()
            .flatMap(
                path ->
                    Stream.<Construction<BiMap<Object, Object>>>of(
                        keys ->
                            path.create(transform(keys, key -> immutableEntry(key, new Object()))),
                        keys ->

    @Test
    @DisplayName("No-arg constructor: null message and cause; can be thrown")
    void defaultConstructor_behavesAsExpected() {
        // Arrange & Act
        SMBProtocolDecodingException ex = new SMBProtocolDecodingException();

        // Assert state
        assertNull(ex.getMessage(), "Default constructor should have null message");
        assertNull(ex.getCause(), "Default constructor should have null cause");

import java.util.logging.Formatter
import java.util.logging.LogRecord

/**
 * Is Java8 Data and Time really this bad, or is writing this on a plane from just javadocs a bad
 * idea?
 *
 * Why so much construction?
 */
class OneLineLogFormat : Formatter() {
  private val d =
    DateTimeFormatterBuilder()
      .appendValue(HOUR_OF_DAY, 2)
      .appendLiteral(':')
      .appendValue(MINUTE_OF_HOUR, 2)

import org.apache.maven.impl.SettingsUtilsV4;

/**
 * Several convenience methods to handle settings
 *
 */
public final class SettingsUtils {

    private SettingsUtils() {
        // don't allow construction.
    }

    /**
     * @param dominant
     * @param recessive
     * @param recessiveSourceLevel
     */
    public static void merge(Settings dominant, Settings recessive, String recessiveSourceLevel) {

 */
@ExtendWith(MockitoExtension.class)
class SmbComLogoffAndXTest {

    @Test
    @DisplayName("constructor accepts null andx")
    void constructorWithNullAndx() {
        SmbComLogoffAndX msg = new SmbComLogoffAndX(null);
        assertNotNull(msg, "Message must not be null after construction");
    }

    @ParameterizedTest
    @ValueSource(ints = { 0, 1, 5, -1, 10 })

 */
@ExtendWith(MockitoExtension.class)
class SmbComCloseTest {

    /**
     * Ensure the constructor sets the {@code command} field of the
     * {@link ServerMessageBlock} superclass to {@link ServerMessageBlock#SMB_COM_CLOSE}.
     */
    @Test
    @DisplayName("happy: constructor sets command correctly")
    void testConstructorSetsCommand() {
        SmbComClose close = new SmbComClose(1, 12345L);

 *     .method("GET")
 *     .url("https://example.com")
 *     .weight(1.0f)
 *     .build();
 * </pre>
 *
 * <p>The builder is implemented using an inner class {@link RequestDataContext} that handles
 * the actual construction of the RequestData object.</p>
 *
 */
public final class RequestDataBuilder {
    private RequestDataBuilder() {
    }

    /**
     * Creates a new RequestDataContext for building RequestData instances.

/**
 * Defines the contract for a component responsible for invoking a Maven application
 * using the information provided in an {@link InvokerRequest}. This interface is central
 * to the construction and invocation of Maven commands and builds, and it fully parses arguments.
 *
 * <p>The Invoker is designed to be flexible, allowing for different implementations

 * <p>
 * Unlike {@link ModelSource}, this interface supports loading of parent POM(s) from the same backing store and allows
 * construction of MavenProject instances without the need to have parent POM(s) available from local or remote
 * repositories.
 * <p>