* GWT claims to support java.lang.Character's char-classification methods, but it actually only
     * works for ASCII. So for now, assume any non-ASCII characters are valid. The only place this
     * seems to be documented is here:
     * https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-web-toolkit-contributors/1UEzsryq1XI
     *
     * <p>ASCII characters in the part are expected to be valid per RFC 1035, with underscore also

errors.app.double.submit.request = Esta solicitação pode já ter sido processada. Por favor, tente novamente.
# _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
# you can define your messages here:
# e.g.
# errors.xxx = ...
# info.xxx = ...
# _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
# ========================================================================================
# Fess
# ======

   * between pads, hoping that the JVM doesn't reorder them.
   *
   * <p>JVM intrinsics note: It would be possible to use a release-only form of CAS here, if it were
   * provided.
   */
  static final class Cell {
    volatile long p0, p1, p2, p3, p4, p5, p6;
    volatile long value;
    volatile long q0, q1, q2, q3, q4, q5, q6;

    Cell(long x) {

) {
  /**
   * Returns the effective top-level domain plus one (eTLD+1) by referencing the public suffix list.
   * Returns null if the domain is a public suffix or a private address.
   *
   * Here are some examples:
   *
   * ```java
   * assertEquals("google.com", getEffectiveTldPlusOne("google.com"));
   * assertEquals("google.com", getEffectiveTldPlusOne("www.google.com"));

      char c = sequence.charAt(i);
      if (c < 0x800) {
        utf8Length += (0x7f - c) >>> 31; // branch free!
      } else {
        utf8Length += 2;
        // We can't use Character.isSurrogate(c) here and below because of GWT.
        if (MIN_SURROGATE <= c && c <= MAX_SURROGATE) {
          // Check that we have a well-formed surrogate pair.
          if (Character.codePointAt(sequence, i) == c) {

    //    second thread can then dispatch to the subscriber it took before the first thread does.
    //
    // All this makes me really wonder if there's any value in queueing here at all. A dispatcher
    // that simply loops through the subscribers and dispatches the event to each would actually
    // probably provide a stronger order guarantee, though that order would obviously be different

    return new FunctionToCacheLoader<>(function);
  }

  /**
   * Returns a cache loader based on an <i>existing</i> supplier instance. Note that there's no need
   * to create a <i>new</i> supplier just to pass it in here; just subclass {@code CacheLoader} and
   * implement {@link #load load} instead.
   *
   * <p>The returned object is serializable if {@code supplier} is serializable.
   *

     *
     * https://github.com/google/guava/issues/2254
     *
     * Other kinds of Errors are possible:
     *
     * - OutOfMemoryError from allocations in setFuture(): The calculus here is similar to
     * StackOverflowError: We can't reliably call setException(error).
     *
     * - Any kind of Error from a listener. Even if we could distinguish that case (by exposing some

   *
   * <p>To ensure that the created instance obeys its contract, the parameters should satisfy the
   * following constraints. This is the callers responsibility and is not enforced here.
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>Both {@code xStats} and {@code yStats} must have the same {@code count}.
   *   <li>If that {@code count} is 1, {@code sumOfProductsOfDeltas} must be exactly 0.0.

errors.app.double.submit.request = Dit verzoek is mogelijk al verwerkt. Probeer de bewerking opnieuw.
# _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
# you can define your messages here:
# e.g.
# errors.xxx = ...
# info.xxx = ...
# _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
# ========================================================================================
# Fess
# ======