}

    /**
     * Test with data that has exact boundary conditions
     */
    @Test
    @DisplayName("Handle exact boundary data size")
    void testExactBoundarySize() throws CIFSException {
        // Test with data that ends exactly at the position where EOL should be checked
        byte[] data = new byte[0];

            // When
            int bytesConsumed = fileFsSizeInfo.decode(buffer, 0, buffer.length);

            // Then
            assertEquals(24, bytesConsumed); // Should always consume exactly 24 bytes
        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should decode from middle of buffer correctly")
        void shouldDecodeFromMiddleOfBuffer() throws SMBProtocolDecodingException {
            // Given

   *
   * <p>If {@code expectedSize} is exactly the number of entries added to the builder before {@link
   * Builder#build} is called, the builder is likely to perform better than an unsized {@link
   * #builder()} would have.
   *
   * <p>It is not specified if any performance benefits apply if {@code expectedSize} is close to,
   * but not exactly, the number of entries added to the builder.
   *
   * @since 23.1

        assertNotNull("Constraint annotation should be present", constraint);
        assertEquals("Validator class should be UriTypeValidator", UriTypeValidator.class, constraint.validatedBy()[0]);
        assertEquals("Should have exactly one validator", 1, constraint.validatedBy().length);
    }

    // Test default values
    public void test_defaultValues() throws Exception {

        }

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should handle boundary conditions")
        void testBoundaryConditions() {
            // Test with exactly aligned data
            request.setData(new byte[8], 0, 8); // 8-byte aligned
            assertEquals(((Smb2Constants.SMB2_HEADER_LENGTH + 48 + 8 + 7) / 8) * 8, request.size());

            // Test with unaligned data

   * permits in a cool state, where X = rate * timeToCoolDown, and we have specified a
   * timeToWarmUp() period, it will cost as the prescribed amount of time. E.g., calling
   * [acquire(5), acquire(1)] takes exactly the same time as [acquire(2), acquire(3), acquire(1)].
   */
  public void testTimeToWarmUpIsHonouredEvenWithWeights() {
    Random random = new Random();
    int warmupPermits = 10;

   * permits in a cool state, where X = rate * timeToCoolDown, and we have specified a
   * timeToWarmUp() period, it will cost as the prescribed amount of time. E.g., calling
   * [acquire(5), acquire(1)] takes exactly the same time as [acquire(2), acquire(3), acquire(1)].
   */
  public void testTimeToWarmUpIsHonouredEvenWithWeights() {
    Random random = new Random();
    int warmupPermits = 10;

        added += q.drainTo(buffer, numElements - added);
        if (added < numElements) { // not enough elements immediately available; will have to poll
          E e; // written exactly once, by a successful (uninterrupted) invocation of #poll
          while (true) {
            try {
              e = q.poll(deadline - System.nanoTime(), NANOSECONDS);
              break;

        String serverName = "SERVERNAME12345"; // 15 characters
        String comment = "Max length name";

        byte[] buffer = new byte[200];
        int bufferIndex = 0;

        // Write server name (exactly 15 bytes)
        byte[] nameBytes = serverName.getBytes(StandardCharsets.US_ASCII);
        System.arraycopy(nameBytes, 0, buffer, bufferIndex, 15);
        buffer[15] = 0; // null terminator at position 15

For that, we update the Pydantic model `TokenData` with a new property `scopes`.

By validating the data with Pydantic we can make sure that we have, for example, exactly a `list` of `str` with the scopes and a `str` with the `username`.

Instead of, for example, a `dict`, or something else, as it could break the application at some point later, making it a security risk.