if (nanoTime >= waitUntil) return@withLock null
          val editCountBefore = editCount
          yieldUntil { nanoTime >= waitUntil || editCount > editCountBefore }
        }
        // TODO report compiler bug
        TODO("Can't get here")
      }
    }

    override fun put(element: T) {
      taskRunner.withLock {
        delegate.put(element)
        editCount++
      }
    }

// Some Android 5.0.x Samsung devices have bugs in JDK reflection APIs that cause
// getDeclaredField to throw a NoSuchFieldException when the field is definitely there.
// Since this class only needs CAS on one field, we can avoid this bug by extending AtomicReference
// instead of using an AtomicReferenceFieldUpdater. This reference stores Thread instances
// and DONE/INTERRUPTED - they have a common ancestor of Runnable.

      } catch (NullPointerException tolerated) {
      }
    } else {
      try {
        entrySet.retainAll(null);
        // We have to tolerate a successful return (Sun bug 4802647)
      } catch (UnsupportedOperationException | NullPointerException e) {
        // Expected.
      }
    }
    assertInvariants(map);
  }

  public void testEntrySetClear() {

   * inputs, regardless of how the elements are divided.
   */
  @SafeVarargs
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  @SuppressWarnings("nullness") // TODO(cpovirk): Remove after we fix whatever the bug is.
  public final CollectorTester<T, A, R> expectCollects(R expectedResult, T... inputs) {
    List<T> list = Arrays.asList(inputs);
    doExpectCollects(expectedResult, list);

     * that seems unlikely enough to be worth complicating the test over, especially if there's any
     * chance that a permissive test could mask a bug.
     */
    expectUnchanged();
    // Be extra thorough in case internal state was corrupted by the expected null.
    assertEquals(new ArrayList<>(), new ArrayList<>(multimap().get(k3())));

* [fluentd-gcp addon] Fixed bug with reporting metrics in event-exporter ([#60126](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/60126), [@serathius](https://github.com/serathius))

func (n *NetworkError) Unwrap() error {
	return n.Err
}

// Client - http based RPC client.
type Client struct {
	connected int32 // ref: https://golang.org/pkg/sync/atomic/#pkg-note-BUG
	_         int32 // For 64 bits alignment
	lastConn  int64

	// HealthCheckFn is the function set to test for health.
	// If not set the client will not keep track of health.

          // I regard highly unlikely that both the little endianness tests above and this one
          // passes, and there is still a little endianness bug lurking around.
        }
      }

      Control control = new Control();
      Hasher controlSink = control.newHasher(1024);

      Iterable<Hasher> sinksAndControl =

        classRepository.each {name, ClassMetaData metaData ->
            linkRepository.put(name, new ClassLinkMetaData(metaData))
        }

        // workaround to IBM JDK bug
        def createDslDocModelClosure = this.&createDslDocModel.curry(classDocbookDirectory.get().asFile, mainDocbookTemplate, classRepository)

        def doc = mainDocbookTemplate
        use(BuildableDOMCategory) {

* **Uvicorn**:
    * 具有最佳性能，因为除了服务器本身外，它没有太多额外的代码。
    * 您不会直接在 Uvicorn 中编写应用程序。这意味着您的代码至少必须包含 Starlette（或 **FastAPI**）提供的代码。如果您这样做了（即直接在 Uvicorn 中编写应用程序），最终的应用程序会和使用了框架并且最小化了应用代码和 bug 的情况具有相同的性能损耗。
    * 如果要对比与 Uvicorn 对标的服务器，请将其与 Daphne，Hypercorn，uWSGI等应用服务器进行比较。
* **Starlette**:
    * 在 Uvicorn 后使用 Starlette，性能会略有下降。实际上，Starlette 使用 Uvicorn运行。因此，由于必须执行更多的代码，它只会比 Uvicorn 更慢。