will have this form (see below). If you don't want to mention the issue in the
text, add it as a comment:
```
<!-- go.dev/issue/12345 -->
```
If an accepted proposal is mentioned in a CL but not in the release notes, it will be
flagged as a TODO by the automated tooling. That is true even for proposals that add API.

Use the following forms in your markdown:

         * than a handful of exceptions. But it seems prudent to set a cap on how many we'll cache.
         * This avoids out-of-control memory consumption, and it keeps the cache from growing so
         * large that doing the lookup is noticeably slower than redoing the work would be.
         *
         * Ideally we'd have a real eviction policy, but until we see a problem in practice, I hope

// the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
// (at your option) any later version.
//
// This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful
// but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
// MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
// GNU Affero General Public License for more details.
//

        try {
            target.expired();
        } catch (Exception e) {
            // Expected that it may fail due to missing dependencies in test environment
            // but method should be callable
            assertNotNull("Exception should not be null if thrown", e);
        }
    }

    public void test_package_structure() {

    expectAdded(e0());
  }

  @CollectionFeature.Require(absent = SUPPORTS_ADD)
  @CollectionSize.Require(absent = ZERO)
  /*
   * absent = ZERO isn't required, since unmodList.add() must
   * throw regardless, but it keeps the method name accurate.
   */
  public void testAdd_unsupportedPresent() {
    assertThrows(UnsupportedOperationException.class, () -> getList().add(e0()));
  }

                .compare(Boolean.TRUE, true)
                .compare(Boolean.TRUE, Boolean.TRUE)
                .result())
        .isEqualTo(0);
  }

  public void testDegenerate() {
    // kinda bogus, but who cares?
    assertThat(ComparisonChain.start().result()).isEqualTo(0);
  }

  public void testOneEqual() {
    assertThat(ComparisonChain.start().compare("a", "a").result()).isEqualTo(0);
  }

import java.util.List;
import org.junit.Ignore;

/**
 * Tests for the {@code inverse} view of a BiMap.
 *
 * <p>This assumes that {@code bimap.inverse().inverse() == bimap}, which is not technically
 * required but is fulfilled by all current implementations.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@GwtCompatible
@Ignore("test runners must not instantiate and run this directly, only via suites we build")

 * License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
 * version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
 *
 * This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
 * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
 * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU
 * Lesser General Public License for more details.
 *

The main purpose of the `__name__ == "__main__"` is to have some code that is executed when your file is called with:

<div class="termy">

```console
$ python myapp.py
```

</div>

but is not called when another file imports it, like in:

```Python
from myapp import app
```

#### More details { #more-details }

Let's say your file is named `myapp.py`.

If you run it with:

// the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
// (at your option) any later version.
//
// This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful
// but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
// MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
// GNU Affero General Public License for more details.
//