*
 * <p>A {@code ValueGraph} built by this class has the following default properties:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>does not allow self-loops
 *   <li>orders {@link ValueGraph#nodes()} in the order in which the elements were added (insertion
 *       order)
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>{@code ValueGraph}s built by this class also guarantee that each collection-returning accessor
 * returns a <b>(live) unmodifiable view</b>; see <a

   *
   * <p>The collections returned by {@link Multimap#keySet()}, {@link Multimap#keys()}, and {@link
   * Multimap#asMap()} will iterate through the keys in the order that they were first added to the
   * multimap, save that if all values associated with a key are removed and then the key is added
   * back into the multimap, that key will come last in the key iteration order.
   */

   *
   * <p>The collections returned by {@link Multimap#keySet()}, {@link Multimap#keys()}, and {@link
   * Multimap#asMap()} will iterate through the keys in the order that they were first added to the
   * multimap, save that if all values associated with a key are removed and then the key is added
   * back into the multimap, that key will come last in the key iteration order.
   */

At that point, by noticing that the server took some microseconds longer to send the "Incorrect username or password" response, the attackers will know that they got _something_ right, some of the initial letters were right.

And then they can try again knowing that it's probably something more similar to `stanleyjobsox` than to `johndoe`.

#### A "professional" attack { #a-professional-attack }

    }
  },
  /**
   * This strategy uses all 128 bits of {@link Hashing#murmur3_128} when hashing. It looks different
   * from the implementation in MURMUR128_MITZ_32 because we're avoiding the multiplication in the
   * loop and doing a (much simpler) += hash2. We're also changing the index to a positive number by
   * AND'ing with Long.MAX_VALUE instead of flipping the bits.
   */
  MURMUR128_MITZ_64() {
    @Override

emailing [******@****.***][codeofconduct_at]. For more details, please see our Reporting
Guidelines below.

Thanks
------

Some of the ideas and wording for the statements and guidelines above were based on work by the
[Twitter][twitter_coc], [Ubuntu][ubuntu_coc], [GDC][gdc_coc], and [Django][django_coc] communities.
We are thankful for their work.

Reporting Guide
---------------

        // Cleanup should not throw exception
        assertDoesNotThrow(() -> bufferManager.cleanup());

        // After cleanup, all regions should be released (but the count may not match exactly
        // if some regions were pooled rather than immediately released)
        assertTrue(bufferManager.getTotalReleased() > 0, "Some regions should be released during cleanup");
        assertEquals(allocatedBeforeCleanup, bufferManager.getTotalReleased(),

    //    were added to the queue. It's easily possible for one thread to take the head of the
    //    queue, immediately followed by another thread taking the next element in the queue. That
    //    second thread can then dispatch to the subscriber it took before the first thread does.
    //
    // All this makes me really wonder if there's any value in queueing here at all. A dispatcher

Before diving deeper into the **Dependency Injection** system, let's upgrade the previous example.

## A `dict` from the previous example { #a-dict-from-the-previous-example }

In the previous example, we were returning a `dict` from our dependency ("dependable"):

{* ../../docs_src/dependencies/tutorial001_an_py310.py hl[9] *}

But then we get a `dict` in the parameter `commons` of the *path operation function*.

        macAddressField.setAccessible(true);
        byte[] parsedMac = (byte[]) macAddressField.get(response);
        assertArrayEquals(testMac, parsedMac);

        // Verify stats were parsed
        // Stats length = rDataLength - (numberOfNames * 18) - 1 = 67 - 54 - 1 = 12
        // But MAC address takes 6 bytes, so actual stats length = 12 - 6 = 6