// Test with minimum size buffer
        byte[] smallBuffer = new byte[2];
        assertEquals(2, trans2GetDfsReferral.writeSetupWireFormat(smallBuffer, 0));

        // Test with exact size buffer
        byte[] exactBuffer = new byte[2];
        assertEquals(2, trans2GetDfsReferral.writeSetupWireFormat(exactBuffer, 0));

        // Test read methods with empty buffer

        byte[] buf = new byte[offset + 8]; // extra space for safety

        // Act
        int written = req.writeBytesWireFormat(buf, offset);

        // Assert: should write exactly 4 bytes
        assertEquals(4, written, "Should report 4 bytes written");
        // StructureSize (2 bytes, LE) == 4
        assertEquals(4, SMBUtil.readInt2(buf, offset));
        // Reserved (2 bytes, LE) == 0

        // Test very large values close to EB boundary
        assertEquals("1.024EB", MemoryUtil.byteCountToDisplaySize(FileUtils.ONE_EB));

        // Test exact thresholds
        assertEquals("1.024KB", MemoryUtil.byteCountToDisplaySize(1024L));
        assertEquals("1.024MB", MemoryUtil.byteCountToDisplaySize(1024L * 1024L));

        byte[] buf = newBuffer(10);

        int written = cmd.writeParametersWireFormat(buf, 0);
        assertEquals(2, written, "writeParametersWireFormat should write exactly 2 bytes");

        // Verify little-endian encoding (0x1234 -> 0x34 0x12)
        assertEquals((byte) 0x34, buf[0], "First byte should be low byte of level");

            // The orchestrator may handle exceptions gracefully and continue
            assertNotNull(result, "Result should not be null");
            // We can't guarantee failure behavior without knowing the exact implementation
        }
    }

    @Nested
    @DisplayName("Strategy Ordering")
    class StrategyOrderingTests {

        @Test
        @DisplayName("should execute strategies in priority order")

        assertTrue(map.containsKey("maven-test:t09-b"), "maven-test:t09-b is not in the project");
        assertFalse(map.containsKey("maven-test:t09-c"), "maven-test:t09-c is in the project");
    }

    /**
     * Setup exactly the same as the above test, except that the child project
     * now depends upon d, which has a transitive dependency on c.  Even though
     * we did list an exclusion on c, it was only from within the context of

   * integrals).
   *
   * Note well that if, for this function, we chose a horizontal line, at height of exactly (1/QPS),
   * then the effect of the function is non-existent: we serve storedPermits at exactly the same
   * cost as fresh ones (1/QPS is the cost for each). We use this trick later.
   *

                        // explicitly exclude. Set result and stop processing.
                        result = false;
                        break;
                    }
                }
                // check for exact match
                else if (repo.equals(originalId)) {
                    result = true;
                    break;
                }
                // check for external:*

  if (isEmpty()) return null

  val position = ParsePosition(0)
  var result = STANDARD_DATE_FORMAT.get().parse(this, position)
  if (position.index == length) {
    // STANDARD_DATE_FORMAT must match exactly; all text must be consumed, e.g. no ignored
    // non-standard trailing "+01:00". Those cases are covered below.
    return result
  }
  synchronized(BROWSER_COMPATIBLE_DATE_FORMAT_STRINGS) {

 *       other tests. We want to exclude the other tests (which Android can't handle) while
 *       continuing to run {@code FooTest} itself. This is exactly what happens with {@code
 *       AndroidIncompatible}. But I'm not sure what would happen if we annotated the {@code
 *       suite()} method with {@code Suppress}. Would {@code FooTest} itself be suppressed, too?