int adjust = size() - 1;
      for (int i = 0; i < axes.size(); i++) {
        adjust *= 31;
        adjust = ~~adjust;
        // in GWT, we have to deal with integer overflow carefully
      }
      int hash = 1;
      for (Set<E> axis : axes) {
        hash = 31 * hash + (size() / axis.size() * axis.hashCode());

        hash = ~~hash;
      }
      hash += adjust;

   * 1}, this method has the identical effect to {@link #add(Object)}. This method is functionally
   * equivalent (except in the case of overflow) to the call {@code
   * addAll(Collections.nCopies(element, occurrences))}, which would presumably perform much more
   * poorly.
   *

   *       tasks -- even tasks that are not themselves {@code directExecutor} tasks.
   *   <li>If many such tasks are chained together (such as with {@code
   *       future.transform(...).transform(...).transform(...)....}), they may overflow the stack.
   *       (In simple cases, callers can avoid this by registering all tasks with the same {@link
   *       MoreExecutors#newSequentialExecutor} wrapper around {@code directExecutor()}. More

    i = 1 << 30;
    assertFalse(MinMaxPriorityQueue.isEvenLevel(i - 2));
    assertTrue(MinMaxPriorityQueue.isEvenLevel(i - 1));
    assertTrue(MinMaxPriorityQueue.isEvenLevel(i));

    // 1 << 31 is negative because of overflow, 1 << 31 - 1 is positive
    // since isEvenLevel adds 1, we need to do - 2.
    assertTrue(MinMaxPriorityQueue.isEvenLevel((1 << 31) - 2));
    assertTrue(MinMaxPriorityQueue.isEvenLevel(Integer.MAX_VALUE - 1));

      /*
       * It speeds things up considerably to unconditionally add count to totalCount here,
       * but that destroys failure atomicity in the case of count overflow. =(
       */
      int cmp = comparator.compare(e, getElement());
      if (cmp < 0) {
        AvlNode<E> initLeft = left;
        if (initLeft == null) {
          result[0] = 0;

discard high bits upon overflow, and programs may rely on "wrap around".
</p>

<p>
For signed integers, the operations <code>+</code>,
<code>-</code>, <code>*</code>, <code>/</code>, and <code>&lt;&lt;</code> may legally
overflow and the resulting value exists and is deterministically defined
by the signed integer representation, the operation, and its operands.

  }

  /** Returns a -1 if unable to parse */
  private static int tryParseDecimal(String string, int start, int end) {
    int decimal = 0;
    final int max = Integer.MAX_VALUE / 10; // for int overflow detection
    for (int i = start; i < end; i++) {
      if (decimal > max) {
        return -1;
      }
      decimal *= 10;
      int digit = Character.digit(string.charAt(i), 10);
      if (digit < 0) {

      /*
       * It speeds things up considerably to unconditionally add count to totalCount here,
       * but that destroys failure atomicity in the case of count overflow. =(
       */
      int cmp = comparator.compare(e, getElement());
      if (cmp < 0) {
        AvlNode<E> initLeft = left;
        if (initLeft == null) {
          result[0] = 0;

  }

  /** There's no reason for the queueSize to ever be more than maxSize + 1 */
  private static int capAtMaximumSize(int queueSize, int maximumSize) {
    return min(queueSize - 1, maximumSize) + 1; // don't overflow
  }

]:0===c.indexOf("max")&&b>e?["max",e]:["ok"]},_numSuggestionElements:0,_selectedSuggestion:null,_previousTypedVal:null,suggest:function(b,d,e){var f={css:{maxHeight:"150px",background:"#FFF",lineHeight:"150%",textDecoration:"underline",overflowX:"hidden",overflowY:"auto",border:"#CCC solid 1px",borderTop:"none",cursor:"pointer"},activeSuggestionCSS:{background:"#E9E9E9"}},g=function(a,b){var c=b.offset();a.css({width:b.outerWidth(),left:c.left+"px",top:c.top+b.outerHeight()+"px"})};e&&a.extend(f...