![Swagger UI interaction](https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/img/index/index-04-swagger-03.png)

* Ezután kattints az "Execute" gompra, a felhasználói felület kommunikálni fog az API-oddal. Elküldi a paramétereket és a visszakapott választ megmutatja a képernyődön.

![Swagger UI interaction](https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/img/index/index-05-swagger-04.png)

![Swagger UI interaction](https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/img/index/index-04-swagger-03.png)

* Então clique no botão "Execute", a interface do usuário irá se comunicar com a API, enviar os parâmetros, pegar os resultados e mostrá-los na tela:

![Swagger UI interaction](https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/img/index/index-05-swagger-04.png)

/// tip | "Dica"

Observe que, assim como [dependências em *decoradores de operação de rota*](dependencies/dependencies-in-path-operation-decorators.md){.internal-link target=_blank}, nenhum valor será passado para sua *função de operação de rota*.

///

O resultado final é que os caminhos dos itens agora são:

* `/items/`
* `/items/{item_id}`

![Swagger UI interaction](https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/img/index/index-04-swagger-03.png)

* Luego haz click en el botón de "Execute". La interfaz de usuario se comunicará con tu API, enviará los parámetros y recibirá los resultados para mostrarlos en pantalla:

![Swagger UI interaction](https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/img/index/index-05-swagger-04.png)

				"X-Amz-Date", "",
				"X-Amz-SignedHeaders", "",
			},
			expectedErrCode: ErrInvalidQueryParams,
		},
	}

	for i, testCase := range testCases {
		inputQuery := url.Values{}
		// iterating through input query key value and setting the inputQuery of type url.Values.
		for j := 0; j < len(testCase.inputQueryKeyVals)-1; j += 2 {
			inputQuery.Set(testCase.inputQueryKeyVals[j], testCase.inputQueryKeyVals[j+1])
		}

    filtered.put("a", 2);
    filtered.put("b", 4);
    assertEquals(ImmutableMap.of("a", 2, "b", 4), filtered);

    Entry<String, Integer> entry = filtered.entrySet().iterator().next();
    assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> entry.setValue(5));

    assertEquals(ImmutableMap.of("a", 2, "b", 4), filtered);
  }

  public void testFilteredValuesClear() {

    *   Pass all Kubernetes 1.9 e2e test, node e2e test and CRI validation tests.
    *   [Kube-up.sh integration](https://github.com/kubernetes-incubator/cri-containerd/blob/master/docs/kube-up.md).
    *   [Full crictl integration including CRI verbose option.](https://github.com/kubernetes-incubator/cri-containerd/blob/master/docs/crictl.md)
    *   Integration with cadvisor to provide better summary api support.

	startOffset, length, err := rs.GetOffsetLength(actualPartSize)
	if err != nil {
		writeErrorResponse(ctx, w, toAPIError(ctx, err), r.URL)
		return
	}

	// maximum copy size for multipart objects in a single operation
	if isMaxObjectSize(length) {
		writeErrorResponse(ctx, w, errorCodes.ToAPIErr(ErrEntityTooLarge), r.URL)
		return
	}

	if isRemoteCopyRequired(ctx, srcBucket, dstBucket, objectAPI) {

it in plaintext (no KMS) or re-encrypts using the KMS.

> Is this change backward compatible? Will it break my setup?

This change is not backward compatible for all setups. In particular, the native
Hashicorp Vault integration - which has been deprecated already - won't be
supported anymore. KES is now mandatory if a third-party KMS should be used.

Further, since the configuration data is encrypted with the KMS, the KMS

  }

  /**
   * Guaranteed to throw an exception and leave the map unmodified.
   *
   * @throws UnsupportedOperationException always
   * @deprecated Unsupported operation.
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  @Deprecated
  @Override
  @DoNotCall("Always throws UnsupportedOperationException")
  @CheckForNull
  public <T extends B> T putInstance(Class<T> type, T value) {