Using these ideas, JWT can be used for way more sophisticated scenarios.

In those cases, several of those entities could have the same ID, let's say `foo` (a user `foo`, a car `foo`, and a blog post `foo`).

{!../../../docs_src/python_types/tutorial001.py!}
```

### Edit it

It's a very simple program.

But now imagine that you were writing it from scratch.

At some point you would have started the definition of the function, you had the parameters ready...

But then you have to call "that method that converts the first letter to upper case".

Was it `upper`? Was it `uppercase`? `first_uppercase`? `capitalize`?

#### Data "schema"

The term "schema" might also refer to the shape of some data, like a JSON content.

In that case, it would mean the JSON attributes, and data types they have, etc.

#### OpenAPI and JSON Schema

        include_in_schema: bool = True,
        json_schema_extra: Union[Dict[str, Any], None] = None,
        **extra: Any,
    ):
        assert default is ..., "Path parameters cannot have a default value"
        self.in_ = self.in_
        super().__init__(
            default=default,
            default_factory=default_factory,
            annotation=annotation,
            alias=alias,

        "bar"
    ],
    "images": [
        {
            "url": "http://example.com/baz.jpg",
            "name": "The Foo live"
        },
        {
            "url": "http://example.com/dave.jpg",
            "name": "The Baz"
        }
    ]
}
```

!!! info
    Beachten Sie, dass der `images`-Schlüssel jetzt eine Liste von Bild-Objekten hat.

## Tief verschachtelte Modelle

!!! info
    Unfortunately, I can't simply trust PRs that just have several approvals.

    Several times it has happened that there are PRs with 3, 5 or more approvals, probably because the description is appealing, but when I check the PRs, they are actually broken, have a bug, or don't solve the problem they claim to solve. 😅

And then, that system (in this case **FastAPI**) will take care of doing whatever is needed to provide your code with those needed dependencies ("inject" the dependencies).

This is very useful when you need to:

* Have shared logic (the same code logic again and again).
* Share database connections.
* Enforce security, authentication, role requirements, etc.
* And many other things...

All these, while minimizing code repetition.

```Python hl_lines="2"
@app.get('/')
def results():
    results = some_library()
    return results
```

---

But now, having `Query(max_length=50)` inside of `Annotated`, we are telling FastAPI that we want it to extract this value from the query parameters (this would have been the default anyway 🤷) and that we want to have **additional validation** for this value (that's why we do this, to get the additional validation). 😎

FastAPI will now:

* **Validate** the data making sure that the max length is 50 characters

    But `OAuth2PasswordRequestForm` is just a class dependency that you could have written yourself, or you could have declared `Form` parameters directly.

    But as it's a common use case, it is provided by **FastAPI** directly, just to make it easier.

### Use the form data

!!! tip