extends AbstractListMultimap<K, V> {
  ArrayListMultimapGwtSerializationDependencies(Map<K, Collection<V>> map) {
    super(map);
  }
  // TODO(cpovirk): Maybe I should have just one shared superclass for AbstractMultimap itself?

 * versions of the {@link FluentFuture#catching(Class, com.google.common.base.Function)
 * FluentFuture.catching} family of methods. Those versions have slightly different signatures.
 */
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
abstract class GwtFluentFutureCatchingSpecialization<V extends @Nullable Object>
    extends AbstractFuture<V> {
  /*

   *     UTF-8, use {@code write(s.getBytes(StandardCharsets.UTF_8))}.
   */
  @Deprecated
  @Override
  void writeBytes(String s);

  /** Returns the contents that have been written to this instance, as a byte array. */
  byte[] toByteArray();

 * identical to the original.
 *
 * @author Chris Povirk
 */
/*
 * The whole thing is really @GwtIncompatible, but GwtJUnitConvertedTestModule doesn't have a
 * parameter for non-GWT, non-test files, and it didn't seem worth adding one for this unusual case.
 */
@GwtCompatible(emulated = true)
final class LenientSerializableTester {
  /*

 * task cannot be implemented with {@link ListeningExecutorService}, the various {@link Futures}
 * utility methods, or {@link ListenableFutureTask}. Those APIs have less opportunity for developer
 * error. If your needs are more complex than {@code SettableFuture} supports, use {@link
 * AbstractFuture}, which offers an extensible version of the API.
 *
 * @author Sven Mawson

    // Test default state of not started.
    assertEquals(1, listenerLatch.getCount());
    assertFalse(task.isDone());
    assertFalse(task.isCancelled());

    // Start the task to put it in the RUNNING state.  Have to use a separate
    // thread because the task will block on the task latch after unblocking
    // the run latch.
    exec.execute(task);
    runLatch.await();
    assertEquals(1, listenerLatch.getCount());

        assertThat(graph.removeNode(nodeList.get(i))).isTrue();
      }

      assertThat(graph.nodes()).hasSize(NUM_NODES - numNodesToRemove);
      // Number of edges remaining is unknown (node's incident edges have been removed).
      AbstractGraphTest.validateGraph(graph);

      for (int i = numNodesToRemove; i < NUM_NODES; ++i) {
        assertThat(graph.removeNode(nodeList.get(i))).isTrue();
      }

/**
 * Implementation of {@link Table} using linked hash tables. This guarantees predictable iteration
 * order of the various views.
 *
 * <p>The views returned by {@link #column}, {@link #columnKeySet()}, and {@link #columnMap()} have
 * iterators that don't support {@code remove()}. Otherwise, all optional operations are supported.
 * Null row keys, columns keys, and values are not supported.
 *

 *       Guava while continuing to run it internally, as we do with many other tests. This would
 *       suffice because we our Android users and tests are using the open-source version, which
 *       would no longer have the problematic test. But why bother when we can instead strip it with
 *       a more precisely named annotation?
 *   <li>While a dependency on Android ought to be easy if it's for annotations only, it will

    return C2 * Integer.rotateLeft(hashCode * C1, 15);
  }

  private boolean checkFilter(int c) {
    return 1 == (1 & (filter >> c));
  }

  // This is all essentially copied from ImmutableSet, but we have to duplicate because
  // of dependencies.

  // Represents how tightly we can pack things, as a maximum.
  private static final double DESIRED_LOAD_FACTOR = 0.5;

  /**