validateTableCopies(table);
    table.put('b', 2, "foo");
    validateTableCopies(table);
    table.put('b', 1, "bar");
    table.put('a', 2, "baz");
    validateTableCopies(table);
    // Even though rowKeySet, columnKeySet, and cellSet have the same
    // iteration ordering, row has an inconsistent ordering.
    assertThat(table.row('b').keySet()).containsExactly(1, 2).inOrder();

         */
        return uncheckedCastNullableTToT(delegate.get(key));
      }
      updateLastKnownIndex();
      /*
       * If the entry has been removed from the map, we return null, even though that might not be a
       * valid value. That's the best we can do, short of holding a reference to the most recently
       * seen value. And while we *could* do that, we aren't required to: Map.Entry explicitly says

 * standard. Key differences include:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>A stream is <i>single-use</i>; it becomes invalid as soon as any "terminal operation" such
 *       as {@code findFirst()} or {@code iterator()} is invoked. (Even though {@code Stream}
 *       contains all the right method <i>signatures</i> to implement {@link Iterable}, it does not
 *       actually do so, to avoid implying repeat-iterability.) {@code FluentIterable}, on the other

   * are thus effectively static during the lifetime of a cache entry.
   *
   * <p>When the weight of an entry is zero it will not be considered for size-based eviction
   * (though it still may be evicted by other means).
   *
   * <p><b>Important note:</b> Instead of returning this as a {@code CacheBuilder}

   *   <li>{@code [3..6]} encloses {@code [4..4)} (even though the latter is empty)
   *   <li>{@code (3..6]} does not enclose {@code [3..6]}
   *   <li>{@code [4..5]} does not enclose {@code (3..6)} (even though it contains every value
   *       contained by the latter range)
   *   <li>{@code [3..6]} does not enclose {@code (1..1]} (even though it contains every value
   *       contained by the latter range)
   * </ul>

    assertFalse(multimap.get("foo") instanceof RandomAccess);
    assertFalse(multimap.get("bar") instanceof RandomAccess);
  }

  /**
   * Confirm that removeAll() returns a List that implements RandomAccess, even though get()
   * doesn't.
   */
  public void testRemoveAllRandomAccess() {
    Multimap<String, Integer> multimap = create();
    multimap.put("foo", 1);
    multimap.put("foo", 3);

  }

  public static <K, V> ImmutableSortedMap<K, V> copyOfSorted(SortedMap<K, ? extends V> map) {
    // If map has a null comparator, the keys should have a natural ordering,
    // even though K doesn't explicitly implement Comparable.
    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
    Comparator<? super K> comparator =
        (map.comparator() == null) ? (Comparator<? super K>) NATURAL_ORDER : map.comparator();

    ReentrantLock lockD = otherFactory.newReentrantLock("LockD");

    // lockA -> lockD
    lockA.lock();
    lockD.lock();
    lockA.unlock();
    lockD.unlock();

    // lockD -> lockA should fail even though lockD is from a different factory.
    lockD.lock();
    PotentialDeadlockException expected =
        assertThrows(PotentialDeadlockException.class, () -> lockA.lock());

         * BCAST, Node Status) we need to augment the hashcode generated
         * for the addresses hostname or failed lookups for one type will
         * be cached and cause other types to fail even though they may
         * not be the authority for the name. For example, if a WINS lookup
         * for FOO fails and caches unknownAddress for FOO, a subsequent
         * lookup for FOO using BCAST should not fail because of that

      try {
        checkCurrentState(RUNNING);
      } finally {
        monitor.leave();
      }
    } else {
      // It is possible due to races that we are currently in the expected state even though we
      // timed out. e.g. if we weren't event able to grab the lock within the timeout we would never
      // even check the guard. I don't think we care too much about this use case but it could lead