* different signatures.
 */
@GwtCompatible
@J2ktIncompatible // Super-sourced
abstract class GwtFuturesCatchingSpecialization {
  /*
   * This server copy of the class is empty. The corresponding GWT copy contains alternative
   * versions of catching() and catchingAsync() with slightly different signatures from the ones
   * found in Futures.java.
   */

package com.google.common.graph;

import com.google.common.annotations.Beta;
import java.util.Set;

/**
 * Supertype for {@link Graphs}, containing the old signatures of methods whose signatures we've
 * changed. This provides binary compatibility for users who compiled against the old signatures.
 */
@Beta
abstract class GraphsBridgeMethods {

  @SuppressWarnings("PreferredInterfaceType")

 * different signatures.
 */
@GwtCompatible
@J2ktIncompatible // Super-sourced
abstract class GwtFuturesCatchingSpecialization {
  /*
   * This server copy of the class is empty. The corresponding GWT copy contains alternative
   * versions of catching() and catchingAsync() with slightly different signatures from the ones
   * found in Futures.java.
   */

 */
@GwtCompatible
@J2ktIncompatible // Super-sourced
abstract class GwtFluentFutureCatchingSpecialization<V extends @Nullable Object>
    extends AbstractFuture<V> {
  /*
   * This server copy of the class is empty. The corresponding GWT copy contains alternative
   * versions of catching() and catchingAsync() with slightly different signatures from the ones
   * found in FluentFuture.java.

package com.google.common.graph;

import com.google.common.annotations.Beta;
import java.util.Set;

/**
 * Supertype for {@link Graphs}, containing the old signatures of methods whose signatures we've
 * changed. This provides binary compatibility for users who compiled against the old signatures.
 */
@Beta
abstract class GraphsBridgeMethods {

  @SuppressWarnings("PreferredInterfaceType")

	signature := calculateSignatureV2(stringToSign, cred.SecretKey)
	return signature
}

// compareSignatureV2 returns true if and only if both signatures
// are equal. The signatures are expected to be base64 encoded strings
// according to the AWS S3 signature V2 spec.
func compareSignatureV2(sig1, sig2 string) bool {
	// Decode signature string to binary byte-sequence representation is required

                } else {
                    classDoc.addClassMethod(methodDoc);
                    signatures.add(method.getOverrideSignature());
                }
            }
        }

        for (ClassDoc supertype : classDoc.getSuperTypes()) {
            for (MethodDoc method: supertype.getClassMethods()){
                if (signatures.add(method.getMetaData().getOverrideSignature())) {
                    classDoc.addClassMethod(method);

        method signatures would look like, for example, even if the method and class names are still
        in flux. This can make the feature you're suggesting much clearer to us.

  - type: textarea
    attributes:
      label: (Optional) What would the method signatures for your feature look like?
      placeholder: |
        e.g.,

        }
        final byte[] signature = digest();
        for (int i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
            if (signature[i] != data[offset + SmbConstants.SIGNATURE_OFFSET + i]) {
                if (log.isDebugEnabled()) {
                    log.debug("signature verification failure"); //$NON-NLS-1$
                    log.debug("Expect: " + Hexdump.toHexString(signature, 0, 8));

     *
     * @return whether signatures are supported but not required
     * @throws SmbException if an error occurs checking signing status
     */
    boolean isSigningOptional() throws SmbException;

    /**
     * Checks if message signing is mandatory for this connection.
     *
     * @return whether signatures are enforced from either side