* because of the possibility of splitting a surrogate pair. The only case in which it is safe to
 * escape strings and concatenate the results is if you can rule out this possibility, either by
 * splitting an existing long string into short strings adaptively around {@linkplain
 * Character#isHighSurrogate surrogate} {@linkplain Character#isLowSurrogate pairs}, or by starting

 *     "Unexpected bill status: %s", bill.status());
 * }</pre>
 *
 * <h3>Comparison to alternatives</h3>
 *
 * <p><b>Note:</b> In some cases the differences explained below can be subtle. When it's unclear
 * which approach to use, <b>don't worry</b> too much about it; just pick something that seems
 * reasonable and it will be fine.
 *
 * <ul>

  /**
   * Catches a bug where when constructing a service manager failed, later interactions with the
   * service could cause IllegalStateExceptions inside the partially constructed ServiceManager.
   * This ISE wouldn't actually bubble up but would get logged by ExecutionQueue. This obfuscated
   * the original error (which was not constructing ServiceManager correctly).
   */
  public void testPartiallyConstructedManager() {

   * String#equalsIgnoreCase}). However in almost all cases that ASCII strings are used, the author
   * probably wanted the behavior provided by this method rather than the subtle and sometimes
   * surprising behavior of {@code toUpperCase()} and {@code toLowerCase()}.
   *
   * @since 16.0
   */
  public static boolean equalsIgnoreCase(CharSequence s1, CharSequence s2) {

from his book, `Rule Forty-two.  ALL PERSONS MORE THAN A MILE
HIGH TO LEAVE THE COURT.'

  Everybody looked at Alice.

  `I'M not a mile high,' said Alice.

  `You are,' said the King.

  `Nearly two miles high,' added the Queen.

  `Well, I shan't go, at any rate,' said Alice:  `besides,
that's not a regular rule:  you invented it just now.'

??u&a-raegelif,de??v&irp?og??y&golonys,olpedew,srab,??a&g?n!.&reh.togrof,sih.togrof,???em?irp?orhc?w??n!goloc?i&lno!.&egats-oree,oree,ysrab,??w??o!.&derno:.gnigats,,ecivres,knilemoh,?hp?latipac?ts&der?e&gdirb?rif???z!.&66duolc,amil,sh,tikcats,???ruoblem??om?p!.&bog?gro?lim?mo&c?n??t&en?opsgolb,?ude??irg?yks??r!.&mo&c?n??ossa?topsgolb,?a&c!htlaeh??pmoc?wtfos??bc?eh?if?ots!.&e&rawpohs,saberots,?yflles,??taeht?u&ces?sni?t&inruf?necca??za???s!.&a!bap.us,disnim321,?b!ibnal?rofmok??c!a??d!b?n&arb?ubro...

 *   <li>All events for a given listener dispatch on the provided {@link #executor}.
 *   <li>It is easy for the user to ensure that listeners are never invoked while holding locks.
 * </ul>
 *
 * The last point is subtle. Often the observable object will be managing its own internal state
 * using a lock, however it is dangerous to dispatch listeners while holding a lock because they

 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Because of this situation, any public method accepting an iterable should invoke the {@code
 * iterator} method only once, and should be tested using this class. Exceptions to this rule should
 * be clearly documented.
 *
 * <p>Note that although your APIs should be liberal in what they accept, your methods which
 * <i>return</i> iterables should make every attempt to return ones of the robust variety.
 *

    assertThat(result).containsExactly(1, 15, 13, 8, 14);
  }

  /**
   * This tests a special case of the removeAt() call. Moving an element sideways on the heap could
   * break the invariants. Sometimes we need to bubble an element up instead of trickling down. See
   * implementation.
   */
  public void testInvalidatingRemove() {
    MinMaxPriorityQueue<Integer> mmHeap = MinMaxPriorityQueue.create();
    mmHeap.addAll(

     * <p>{@code [<E>]} will be returned for ArrayList's constructor. When both the class and the
     * constructor have type parameters, the class parameters are prepended before those of the
     * constructor's. This is an arbitrary rule since no existing language spec mandates one way or
     * the other. From the declaration syntax, the class type parameter appears first, but the call
     * syntax may show up in opposite order such as {@code new <A>Foo<B>()}.