# WARNING: DO NOT EDIT, THIS FILE IS A COPY.
# The original version of this file is located at /manifests/helm-profiles directory.
# If you want to make a change in this file, edit the original one and run "make gen".

# The preview profile contains features that are experimental.
# This is intended to explore new features coming to Istio.
# Stability, security, and performance are not guaranteed - use at your own risk.
meshConfig:
  defaultConfig:

# WARNING: DO NOT EDIT, THIS FILE IS A COPY.
# The original version of this file is located at /manifests/helm-profiles directory.
# If you want to make a change in this file, edit the original one and run "make gen".

# The preview profile contains features that are experimental.
# This is intended to explore new features coming to Istio.
# Stability, security, and performance are not guaranteed - use at your own risk.
meshConfig:
  defaultConfig:

# The preview profile contains features that are experimental.
# This is intended to explore new features coming to Istio.
# Stability, security, and performance are not guaranteed - use at your own risk.
meshConfig:
  defaultConfig:
    proxyMetadata:
      # Enable Istio agent to handle DNS requests for known hosts
      # Unknown hosts will automatically be resolved using upstream dns servers in resolv.conf

github-social-preview.png...

* They are rarely updated after creation and initial review, and then become hard to follow, especially after important decisions are made
* They are not synced with the code to reflect the eventual solution that is committed
* Google Docs is not a "code oriented" tool, like asciidoc can be
* Review in Google Doc is not as simple as a PR code review in GitHub

## Decision

* They are rarely updated after creation and initial review, and then become hard to follow, especially after important decisions are made
* They are not synced with the code to reflect the eventual solution that is committed
* Google Docs is not a "code-oriented" tool, like asciidoc can be
* Review in Google Docs is not as simple as a PR code review in GitHub

## Decision

    console.log(pr_resp);
    throw `PR:{pr_number} needs to be valid and closed (merged)`;
  }
  const pr_title = pr_resp.data.title;
  // Assign to PR owner and reviewers
  const assignees = pr_resp.data.assignees.concat(pr_resp.data.requested_reviewers);
  let assignee_logins = assignees.map(x => x.login);
  assignee_logins.push(pr_resp.data.user.login);
  console.log(assignee_logins);

github-social-preview.svg...

// rest : 2013-12-19 Punto 2012 Sociedad Anonima Promotora de Inversion de Capital Variable
rest

// restaurant : 2014-07-03 Binky Moon, LLC
restaurant

// review : 2014-11-20 dot Review Limited
review

// reviews : 2013-09-13 Dog Beach, LLC
reviews

// rexroth : 2015-06-18 Robert Bosch GMBH
rexroth

// rich : 2013-11-21 iRegistry GmbH
rich

  # If someone is a primary author of the files in a change, but NOT the pr author, automatically add them as a reviewer.
  add_usual_expert:
    if:
      - {{ ('add_usual_expert' | isEnabledAutomation(pr)) }}
      - {{ repo | codeExperts(gt=50) | match(branch.author) | nope }}
    run:
      - action: add-reviewers@v1
        args: