- Sort Score
- Result 10 results
- Languages All
Results 1 - 10 of 10 for reviews (0.2 sec)
-
.github/workflows/auto-assign-pr-to-author.yml
name: 'Auto Assign PR to Author' on: pull_request: types: [opened] permissions: contents: read jobs: add-reviews: permissions: contents: read # for kentaro-m/auto-assign-action to fetch config file pull-requests: write # for kentaro-m/auto-assign-action to assign PR reviewers runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps:
Others - Registered: Wed May 01 11:36:15 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Tue Jan 30 18:26:59 GMT 2024 - 395 bytes - Viewed (0) -
.cm/add_usual_expert.cm
# If someone is a primary author of the files in a change, but NOT the pr author, automatically add them as a reviewer. add_usual_expert: if: - {{ ('add_usual_expert' | isEnabledAutomation(pr)) }} - {{ repo | codeExperts(gt=50) | match(branch.author) | nope }} run: - action: add-reviewers@v1 args:
Plain Text - Registered: Wed May 01 11:36:15 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Fri Apr 12 13:42:16 GMT 2024 - 1.4K bytes - Viewed (0) -
.cm/estimated_time_to_review.cm
automations: # Add a label that indicates how many minutes it will take to review the PR and categorizes it estimated_time_to_review: if: - {{ ('estimated_time_to_review' | isEnabledAutomation(pr)) }} run: - action: add-label@v1 # etr is defined in the last section of this example args: label: "{{ calc.etr }} min review"
Plain Text - Registered: Wed May 01 11:36:15 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Fri Apr 12 13:42:16 GMT 2024 - 2K bytes - Viewed (0) -
.cm/misc_labels.cm
- {{ is.formatting }} run: - action: add-label@v1 args: label: 'a:chore' - action: approve@v1 # Call out PRs that change the build script (and will be longer to checkout and review) label_build_script_change: if: - {{ ('misc_labels' | isEnabledAutomation(pr)) }} - {{ is.build_script_change }} run: - action: add-label@v1 args:
Plain Text - Registered: Wed May 01 11:36:15 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Fri Apr 12 13:42:16 GMT 2024 - 3K bytes - Viewed (0) -
.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md
<!-- Fixes #? --> ### Context <!--- Why do you believe many users will benefit from this change? --> <!--- Link to relevant issues or forum discussions here --> ### Contributor Checklist - [ ] [Review Contribution Guidelines](https://github.com/gradle/gradle/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md).
Plain Text - Registered: Wed May 01 11:36:15 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Tue Feb 13 22:36:19 GMT 2024 - 1.7K bytes - Viewed (0) -
.github/auto_assign.yml
# Set to true to add reviewers to pull requests addReviewers: false # Set to true to add assignees to pull requests addAssignees: author # A number of assignees to add to the pull request # Set to 0 to add all of the assignees. # Uses numberOfReviewers if unset.
Others - Registered: Wed May 01 11:36:15 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Tue Mar 08 03:48:52 GMT 2022 - 286 bytes - Viewed (0) -
.cm/plugins/filters/isEnabledAutomation/index.js
// Require Opt-In/User Request enabled.set('code_experts', []); // Always run enabled.set('add_usual_expert', ['always']); enabled.set('complex_changes', ['always']); enabled.set('estimated_time_to_review', ['always']); enabled.set('misc_labels', ['always']); enabled.set('platform_labels', ['always']); /** * @module isEnabledAutomation * @description Returns true if the given automation should run against the given PR.
JavaScript - Registered: Wed May 01 11:36:15 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Fri Apr 12 13:42:16 GMT 2024 - 3.1K bytes - Viewed (0) -
architecture-standards/0001-use-architectural-decision-records.md
* They are rarely updated after creation and initial review, and then become hard to follow, especially after important decisions are made * They are not synced with the code to reflect the eventual solution that is committed * Google Docs is not a "code oriented" tool, like asciidoc can be * Review in Google Doc is not as simple as a PR code review in GitHub ## Decision
Plain Text - Registered: Wed Feb 14 11:36:15 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Wed Feb 07 00:43:19 GMT 2024 - 2.8K bytes - Viewed (0) -
architecture/standards/0001-use-architectural-decision-records.md
* They are rarely updated after creation and initial review, and then become hard to follow, especially after important decisions are made * They are not synced with the code to reflect the eventual solution that is committed * Google Docs is not a "code-oriented" tool, like asciidoc can be * Review in Google Docs is not as simple as a PR code review in GitHub ## Decision
Plain Text - Registered: Wed May 01 11:36:15 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Sat Mar 02 21:54:40 GMT 2024 - 2.8K bytes - Viewed (0) -
CONTRIBUTING.md
> and you can rely on it after doing initial sanity check and targeted local testing. ### Submitting Your Change After you submit your pull request, a Gradle developer will review it. It is normal for this to take several iterations, so don't get discouraged by change requests. They ensure the high quality that we all enjoy.
Plain Text - Registered: Wed May 01 11:36:15 GMT 2024 - Last Modified: Fri Feb 09 15:30:53 GMT 2024 - 15.6K bytes - Viewed (0)