# its own file.

on:
  - pr_created
  - commit
  - comment_added

automations:

  # Add a label that indicates how many minutes it will take to review the PR and categorizes it
  estimated_time_to_review:
    if:
      - {{ ('estimated_time_to_review' | isEnabledAutomation(pr)) }}
    run:
      - action: add-label@v1

To regenerate the manifests, run:

```bash
$ make copy-templates update-golden
```

## Step 5. Create a PR using outputs from Steps 1 to 4

	}

	if opts.FileNameFunc == nil {
		opts.FileNameFunc = defaultFilenameFunc
	}

	pr, pw := xioutil.WaitPipe()

	w := &Writer{
		opts: opts,
		pw:   pw,
		pr:   pr,
	}

	if w.f == nil {
		if err := w.rotate(); err != nil {
			return nil, fmt.Errorf("Failed to create log file: %w", err)
		}
	}

	go w.listen()

    This allows us to reduce the delay to external partners
    Add Labels - kokoro:force-run
    The PR is also assigned to specific teams to fast track review
    Additional reviewers can be added manually based on PR contents
  @param {!object}
    github enables querying for PR and also create issue using rest endpoint
    context has the commit message details in the payload

        If you found a clear typo, please open a PR with a fix instead of opening an issue.

  - type: dropdown
    id: issue-type
    attributes:
      label: Issue type
      options:
        - Wrong or misleading information
        - Missing information
        - Styling or Accessibility
        - Typo (please open a PR instead)
    validations:
      required: true
  - type: textarea

!!! info
    Niestety, nie mogę ślepo ufać PR-om, nawet jeśli mają kilka zatwierdzeń.

    Kilka razy zdarzyło się, że PR-y miały 3, 5 lub więcej zatwierdzeń (prawdopodobnie dlatego, że opis obiecuje rozwiązanie ważnego problemu), ale gdy sam sprawdziłem danego PR-a, okazał się być zbugowany lub nie rozwiązywał problemu, który rzekomo miał rozwiązywać. 😅

# its own file.

on:
  - pr_created
  - commit
  - comment_added

automations:

  # If a PR contains non-trivial source changes and no tests, add a comment to the PR
  lacks_tests:
    if:
      - {{ ('lacks_tests' | isEnabledAutomation(pr)) }}
      - {{ includes_src_changes }}
      - {{ not (includes_test_changes) }}

/**
 * @module computeStatistics
 * @description Summarizes the changes to files in the PR by platform.
 *
 * @param {Map} groupedFiles - map of platforms for containing info about the changes to files in that platform, from call to categorize
 * @param {[FileMetadata]} fileMetadatas - gitStream's list of metadata about file changes in the PR including path
 * @returns {[Object]} Returns list of computed summary statistic objects for each platform in the input groupedFiles

- Don’t change public API lightly, avoid if possible, and include your reasoning in the PR if essential.  It causes pain for developers who use OkHttp and sometimes runtime errors.
- Favour a working external library if appropriate.  There are many examples of OkHttp libraries that can sit on top or hook in via existing APIs.
- Get working code on a personal branch with tests before you submit a PR.

**Please provide a description of this PR:**



**To help us figure out who should review this PR, please put an X in all the areas that this PR affects.**

- [ ] Ambient
- [ ] Configuration Infrastructure
- [ ] Docs
- [ ] Dual Stack
- [ ] Installation
- [ ] Networking
- [ ] Performance and Scalability
- [ ] Policies and Telemetry
- [ ] Security
- [ ] Test and Release
- [ ] User Experience
- [ ] Developer Infrastructure