### Typical Pull Request Workflow -

**1. New PR**

- As a contributor, you submit a New PR on GitHub.
- We inspect every incoming PR and add certain labels to the PR such as `size:`,
  `comp:` etc.  At this stage we check if the PR is valid and meets certain
  quality requirements. For example, we check if the CLA is signed, PR has
  sufficient description, if applicable unit tests are added, if it is a

    # Messages to create or check
    new_translation_message = f"Good news everyone! 😉 There's a new translation PR to be reviewed: #{pr.number} by @{pr.user.login}. 🎉 This requires 2 approvals from native speakers to be merged. 🤓"
    done_translation_message = f"~There's a new translation PR to be reviewed: #{pr.number} by @{pr.user.login}~ Good job! This is done. 🍰☕"

    # Normally only one language, but still
    for lang in langs:

    )
    return discussion_experts_results


def get_pr_nodes(settings: Settings) -> List[PullRequestNode]:
    pr_nodes: List[PullRequestNode] = []
    pr_edges = get_graphql_pr_edges(settings=settings)

    while pr_edges:
        for edge in pr_edges:
            pr_nodes.append(edge.node)
        last_edge = pr_edges[-1]
        pr_edges = get_graphql_pr_edges(settings=settings, after=last_edge.cursor)
    return pr_nodes

!!! info
    Niestety, nie mogę ślepo ufać PR-om, nawet jeśli mają kilka zatwierdzeń.

    Kilka razy zdarzyło się, że PR-y miały 3, 5 lub więcej zatwierdzeń (prawdopodobnie dlatego, że opis obiecuje rozwiązanie ważnego problemu), ale gdy sam sprawdziłem danego PR-a, okazał się być zbugowany lub nie rozwiązywał problemu, który rzekomo miał rozwiązywać. 😅

		return nil, err
	}
	if !ok {
		return nil, os.ErrNotExist
	}

	pr, pw := io.Pipe()

	wa := &writerAt{
		buffer: make(map[int64][]byte),
		w:      pw,
		r:      pr,
		wg:     &sync.WaitGroup{},
	}
	wa.wg.Add(1)
	go func() {
		_, err := clnt.PutObject(r.Context(), bucket, object, pr, -1, minio.PutObjectOptions{
			ContentType:          mimedb.TypeByExtension(path.Ext(object)),

* If the PR can be simplified in a way, you can ask for that, but there's no need to be too picky, there might be a lot of subjective points of view (and I will have my own as well 🙈), so it's better if you can focus on the fundamental things.

### Tests

* Help me check that the PR has **tests**.

* Check that the tests **fail** before the PR. 🚨

* Wenn der PR irgendwie vereinfacht werden kann, fragen Sie ruhig danach, aber seien Sie nicht zu wählerisch, es gibt viele subjektive Standpunkte (und ich habe auch meinen eigenen 🙈), also ist es besser, wenn man sich auf die wesentlichen Dinge konzentriert.

### Tests

* Helfen Sie mir zu überprüfen, dass der PR **Tests** hat.

* Überprüfen Sie, dass diese Tests vor dem PR **fehlschlagen**. 🚨

* 每翻译一个页面新增一个 pull request。这将使其他人更容易对其进行评审。

对于我（译注：作者使用西班牙语和英语）不懂的语言，我将在等待其他人评审翻译之后将其合并。

* 你还可以查看是否有你所用语言的翻译，并对其进行评审，这将帮助我了解翻译是否正确以及能否将其合并。
    * 可以在 <a href="https://github.com/tiangolo/fastapi/discussions/categories/translations" class="external-link" target="_blank">GitHub Discussions</a> 中查看。

    }


    @Override
    public String getUserDomain () {
        if ( this.realm == null && this.getSubject() != null ) {
            Set<Principal> pr = this.getSubject().getPrincipals();
            for ( Iterator<Principal> ite = pr.iterator(); ite.hasNext(); ) {
                try {
                    KerberosPrincipal entry = (KerberosPrincipal) ite.next();
                    return entry.getRealm();

porsangu.no porsgrunn.no porsáŠgu.no port.fr portal.museum portland.museum portlligat.museum post post.in postman-echo.com posts-and-telecommunications.museum potager.org potenza.it powiat.pl poznan.pl pp.az pp.ru pp.se pp.ua ppg.br pr pr.gov.br pr.it pr.leg.br pr.us pramerica prato.it praxi prd.fr prd.km prd.mg prequalifyme.today preservation.museum presidio.museum press press.aero press.cy press.ma press.museum press.se presse.ci presse.km presse.ml pri.ee prime primetel.cloud principe.st priv.at...