value: >
        Comparing two approaches to a use case side by side can make it easier to examine the
        differences between them.


        Additionally, it's very useful to us if you can provide a "straw API" — what the
        method signatures would look like, for example, even if the method and class names are still
        in flux. This can make the feature you're suggesting much clearer to us.

  - type: textarea

        able to discuss the full details of what you're working on.


        But Guava aims to provide functionality that is useful across boundaries of projects,
        companies, or even industries — utilities useful for a sizable proportion of all Java
        programmers everywhere. If you can give enough detail such that any of us can imagine coming

Others are introduced with <a href="#Type_declarations">type declarations</a>
or <a href="#Type_parameter_declarations">type parameter lists</a>.
<i>Composite types</i>&mdash;array, struct, pointer, function,
interface, slice, map, and channel types&mdash;may be constructed using
type literals.
</p>

<p>
Predeclared types, defined types, and type parameters are called <i>named types</i>.

<p>
The language <a href="#Predeclared_identifiers">predeclares</a> certain type names.
Others are introduced with <a href="#Type_declarations">type declarations</a>.
<i>Composite types</i>&mdash;array, struct, pointer, function,
interface, slice, map, and channel types&mdash;may be constructed using
type literals.
</p>

<p>
Each type <code>T</code> has an <i>underlying type</i>: If <code>T</code>