<artifactId>maven-it-plugin-packaging</artifactId>
        <version>2.1-SNAPSHOT</version>
      </plugin>
      <plugin>
        <groupId>org.apache.maven.its.plugins</groupId>
        <artifactId>maven-it-plugin-expression</artifactId>
        <version>2.1-SNAPSHOT</version>
      </plugin>
      <plugin>
        <groupId>org.apache.maven.its.plugins</groupId>
        <artifactId>maven-it-plugin-fork</artifactId>

  * Not all "remote" repositories will fail. Specifically, if the remote
    repo uses the file:// protocol, and it doesn't refer to a shared
    filesystem, it will continue to be available.

  The question remaining is: Which level of offline mode will we support? It
  seems reasonable to assume that users will be able to tell when localhost is

<img src="/img/tutorial/separate-openapi-schemas/image02.png">
</div>

This means that it will **always have a value**, it's just that sometimes the value could be `None` (or `null` in JSON).

That means that, clients using your API don't have to check if the value exists or not, they can **assume the field will always be there**, but just that in some cases it will have the default value of `None`.

You send it a token and it returns an authenticated user.

This provider might be charging you per request, and calling it might take some extra time than if you had a fixed mock user for tests.

You probably want to test the external provider once, but not necessarily call it for every test that runs.

                + " It is derived from the main artifact.");
    }

    public String getBaseVersion() {
        return parent.getBaseVersion();
    }

    public void setBaseVersion(String baseVersion) {
        throw new UnsupportedOperationException("Cannot change the version information for an attached artifact."
                + " It is derived from the main artifact.");
    }

#### Fix it with `secrets.compare_digest()`

But in our code we are actually using `secrets.compare_digest()`.

In short, it will take the same time to compare `stanleyjobsox` to `stanleyjobson` than it takes to compare `johndoe` to `stanleyjobson`. And the same for the password.

That way, using `secrets.compare_digest()` in your application code, it will be safe against this whole range of security attacks.

brown hair!  And it'll fetch things when you throw them, and
it'll sit up and beg for its dinner, and all sorts of things--I
can't remember half of them--and it belongs to a farmer, you
know, and he says it's so useful, it's worth a hundred pounds!
He says it kills all the rats and--oh dear!' cried Alice in a
sorrowful tone, `I'm afraid I've offended it again!'  For the

// This file is part of MinIO Object Storage stack
//
// This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
// it under the terms of the GNU Affero General Public License as published by
// the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
// (at your option) any later version.
//
// This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful
// but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of

       *   the case that the service is using CustomScheduler). (It needs it so that it can cancel
       *   the task and detect whether it has been cancelled.)
       *
       * - ReschedulableCallable has a reference back to its enclosing CustomScheduler. (It needs it
       *   so that it can call getNextSchedule).
       *
       * Maybe there is a way to avoid this cycle. But we think the cycle is safe enough to ignore:

                It could be any valid Pydantic *field* type. So, it doesn't have to
                be a Pydantic model, it could be other things, like a `list`, `dict`,
                etc.

                It will be used for:

                * Documentation: the generated OpenAPI (and the UI at `/docs`) will
                    show it as the response (JSON Schema).