*   the case that the service is using CustomScheduler). (It needs it so that it can cancel
       *   the task and detect whether it has been cancelled.)
       *
       * - ReschedulableCallable has a reference back to its enclosing CustomScheduler. (It needs it
       *   so that it can call getNextSchedule).
       *
       * Maybe there is a way to avoid this cycle. But we think the cycle is safe enough to ignore:

     *   <li>If this field's value is some other thread object, we know that it's not our thread.
     *   <li>If this field's value == null because it originally belonged to another thread and that
     *       thread cleared it, we still know that it's not associated with our thread
     *   <li>If this field's value == null because it was associated with our thread and was

   * this method should cause a call to {@link #notifyStarted()}, either during this method's run,
   * or after it has returned. If startup fails, the invocation should cause a call to {@link
   * #notifyFailed(Throwable)} instead.
   *
   * <p>This method should return promptly; prefer to do work on a different thread where it is
   * convenient. It is invoked exactly once on service startup, even when {@link #startAsync} is
   * called multiple times.

        forking Guava yourself.


        We want to see that new features have some significant advantage over the alternatives.
        These advantages can take
        [many forms](https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/PhilosophyExplained#utility), but taking
        the time to discuss them in detail will make it much clearer why this feature should be
        added to Guava.

   * documentation).
   */
  public boolean isOrdered(Iterable<? extends T> iterable) {
    Iterator<? extends T> it = iterable.iterator();
    if (it.hasNext()) {
      T prev = it.next();
      while (it.hasNext()) {
        T next = it.next();
        if (compare(prev, next) > 0) {
          return false;
        }
        prev = next;
      }
    }
    return true;
  }

  /**
   * Helper method to grow the character buffer as needed, this only happens once in a while so it's
   * ok if it's in a method call. If the index passed in is 0 then no copying will be done.
   */
  private static char[] growBuffer(char[] dest, int index, int size) {
    if (size < 0) { // overflow - should be OutOfMemoryError but GWT/j2cl don't support it
      throw new AssertionError("Cannot increase internal buffer any further");
    }

      Iterable<? extends T> iterable, Comparator<T> comparator) {
    checkNotNull(comparator);
    Iterator<? extends T> it = iterable.iterator();
    if (it.hasNext()) {
      T prev = it.next();
      while (it.hasNext()) {
        T next = it.next();
        if (comparator.compare(prev, next) >= 0) {
          return false;
        }
        prev = next;
      }
    }

  //    (hypothetical) unsafe read by our caller. Note: adding 'volatile' does not fix this issue,
  //    it would just add an edge such that if done() observed non-null, then it would also
  //    definitely observe all earlier writes, but we still have no guarantee that done() would see
  //    the initial write (just stronger guarantees if it does).
  //
  // See: http://cs.oswego.edu/pipermail/concurrency-interest/2015-January/013800.html

   * AtomicInteger results in zero, we compareAndSet the value to zero; if that succeeds, we remove
   * the entry from the Map. If another operation sees a zero in the map, it knows that the entry is
   * about to be removed, so this operation may remove it (often by replacing it with a new
   * AtomicInteger).
   */

  /** The number of occurrences of each element. */
  private final transient ConcurrentMap<E, AtomicInteger> countMap;

    // Exists to test that our framework doesn't run it:
    @SuppressWarnings("unused")
    @ExampleDerivedFeature.Require({
      ExampleDerivedFeature.DERIVED_FEATURE_1,
      ExampleDerivedFeature.DERIVED_FEATURE_2
    })
    public void testRequiringTwoExplicitDerivedFeatures() throws Exception {
      doNotActuallyRunThis();
    }

    // Exists to test that our framework doesn't run it:
    @SuppressWarnings("unused")