* Object)} are even more convenient.
   *
   * <p>Builder instances can be reused - it is safe to call {@link #buildOrThrow} multiple times to
   * build multiple tables in series. Each table is a superset of the tables created before it.
   *
   * @since 11.0
   */
  @DoNotMock
  public static final class Builder<R, C, V> {

    // the underlying supplier hasn't executed yet
    assertEquals(0, countingSupplier.calls);

    assertEquals(10, (int) memoizedSupplier.get());

    // now it has
    assertEquals(1, countingSupplier.calls);

    assertEquals(10, (int) memoizedSupplier.get());

    // it still should only have executed once due to memoization
    assertEquals(1, countingSupplier.calls);
  }

  public void testMemoize() {

    // the underlying supplier hasn't executed yet
    assertEquals(0, countingSupplier.calls);

    assertEquals(10, (int) memoizedSupplier.get());

    // now it has
    assertEquals(1, countingSupplier.calls);

    assertEquals(10, (int) memoizedSupplier.get());

    // it still should only have executed once due to memoization
    assertEquals(1, countingSupplier.calls);
  }

  public void testMemoize() {

  public void testGreatestOfIterable_simple() {
    /*
     * If greatestOf() promised to be implemented as reverse().leastOf(), this
     * test would be enough. It doesn't... but we'll cheat and act like it does
     * anyway. There's a comment there to remind us to fix this if we change it.
     */
    List<Integer> list = Arrays.asList(3, 1, 3, 2, 4, 2, 4, 3);
    assertEquals(Arrays.asList(4, 4, 3, 3), numberOrdering.greatestOf(list, 4));
  }

  public void testGreatestOfIterable_simple() {
    /*
     * If greatestOf() promised to be implemented as reverse().leastOf(), this
     * test would be enough. It doesn't... but we'll cheat and act like it does
     * anyway. There's a comment there to remind us to fix this if we change it.
     */
    List<Integer> list = Arrays.asList(3, 1, 3, 2, 4, 2, 4, 3);
    assertEquals(Arrays.asList(4, 4, 3, 3), numberOrdering.greatestOf(list, 4));
  }

    }

    /**
     * The event "artifact resolved" if fired WHENEVER an artifact is resolved, BUT it happens also when an artifact
     * descriptor (model, the POM) is being built, and parent (and parent of parent...) is being asked for. Hence, this
     * method "filters" out in WHICH artifact are we interested in, but it intentionally neglects extension as

            Thread.currentThread().setContextClassLoader(projectRealm);
        }
    }

    // TODO I'm really wondering where this method belongs; smells like it should be on MavenProject, but for some
    // reason it isn't ? This localization is kind-of a code smell.

    public static String getKey(MavenProject project) {

 * 
 * This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
 * modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
 * License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
 * version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
 * 
 * This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
 * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of

        .containsExactly(0L, 1L, 3L, 6L, 10L, 15L, 21L)
        .inOrder();
  }

  public void testCopyOf_array_empty() {
    /*
     * We don't guarantee the same-as property, so we aren't obligated to test it. However, it's
     * useful in testing - when two things are the same then one can't have bugs the other doesn't.
     */
    assertThat(ImmutableLongArray.copyOf(new long[0])).isSameInstanceAs(ImmutableLongArray.of());
  }

/*
 * © 2016 AgNO3 Gmbh & Co. KG
 * 
 * This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
 * modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
 * License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
 * version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
 * 
 * This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
 * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of