/*
     * TODO(cpovirk): Should whenAllComplete().call*() log errors, too? Currently, it doesn't call
     * handleException() at all.
     */
    if (throwable instanceof Error) {
      /*
       * TODO(cpovirk): Do we really want to log this if we called setException(throwable) and it
       * returned true? This was intentional (CL 46470009), but it seems odd compared to how we
       * normally handle Error.
       *

    private boolean foundAndRemovedExactReference(Iterable<E> elements, E target) {
      for (Iterator<E> it = elements.iterator(); it.hasNext(); ) {
        E element = it.next();
        if (element == target) {
          it.remove();
          return true;
        }
      }
      return false;
    }

   * is complete. It does so by using daemon threads and adding a shutdown hook to wait for their
   * completion.
   *
   * <p>This is mainly for fixed thread pools. See {@link Executors#newFixedThreadPool(int)}.
   *
   * @param executor the executor to modify to make sure it exits when the application is finished

   * may not occur at all. However, despite these limitations,
   * observed contention rates are typically low in these cases.
   *
   * It is possible for a Cell to become unused when threads that
   * once hashed to it terminate, as well as in the case where
   * doubling the table causes no thread to hash to it under
   * expanded mask.  We do not try to detect or remove such cells,
   * under the assumption that for long-running instances, observed

 * #minValue} and {@link #maxValue} should also be overridden for bounded types.
 *
 * <p>A discrete domain always represents the <i>entire</i> set of values of its type; it cannot
 * represent partial domains such as "prime integers" or "strings of length 5."
 *
 * <p>See the Guava User Guide section on <a href=
 * "https://github.com/google/guava/wiki/RangesExplained#discrete-domains">{@code

   *
   * <p>Despite the method name, this method attempts to avoid actually copying the data when it is
   * safe to do so. The exact circumstances under which a copy will or will not be performed are
   * undocumented and subject to change.
   *
   * <p>This method is not type-safe, as it may be called on elements that are not mutually
   * comparable.
   *

   * Returns the sum of {@code a} and {@code b} unless it would overflow or underflow in which case
   * {@code Integer.MAX_VALUE} or {@code Integer.MIN_VALUE} is returned, respectively.
   *
   * @since 20.0
   */
  public static int saturatedAdd(int a, int b) {
    return Ints.saturatedCast((long) a + b);
  }

  /**
   * Returns the difference of {@code a} and {@code b} unless it would overflow or underflow in

        assertThat(map.size(), is(4));
        final Iterator<Entry<TypeVariable<?>, Type>> it = map.entrySet().iterator();
        Entry<TypeVariable<?>, Type> entry = it.next();
        assertThat(entry.getKey().getName(), is("T1"));
        assertThat(entry.getValue(), is(sameClass(Integer.class)));
        entry = it.next();
        assertThat(entry.getKey().getName(), is("T2"));

 * socket option on an IPv6 socket). Yes, it's confusing. Nevertheless, these "mapped" addresses
 * were never supposed to be seen on the wire. That assumption was dropped, some say mistakenly, in
 * later RFCs with the apparent aim of making IPv4-to-IPv6 transition simpler.
 *
 * <p>Technically one <i>can</i> create a 128bit IPv6 address with the wire format of a "mapped"

        // so specify this size for test
        return 2000; // you can override as you like it
    }

    protected void throwTooLongBoundarySizeException(final String contentType, final int boundarySize, final int limitSize) {
        final ExceptionMessageBuilder br = new ExceptionMessageBuilder();
        br.addNotice("Too long boundary size so treats it as 404.");
        br.addItem("Advice");
        br.addElement("Against for JVN14876762.");