return name.startsWith("kotlin.jvm.functions.Function")
    }

    val ktTypeRawName = ktTypeAsText
        .trimEnd('?') // nullability is not part of JVM types
        .substringBefore('<') // generics are not part of parameter types in JVM method signatures

    val thisTypeAsKt = primitiveTypeStrings[name] ?: name
    return thisTypeAsKt.endsWith(ktTypeRawName)
}


private

Typically, the whole `kclient.Client` is used,though.

Functionality offered by `kclient` includes:
* Typed clients (via generics) and more ergonomic APIs
* Ability to make a _delayed_ client. This is used when making clients based on CRDs that may not exist.

   * instead of {@code R extends Comparable<? super R>}, and the same for {@code C}. That's
   * necessary to support classes defined without generics.
   */
  @SuppressWarnings("rawtypes") // https://github.com/google/guava/issues/989
  public static <R extends Comparable, C extends Comparable, V> TreeBasedTable<R, C, V> create() {

   * value should be required because the instance is known to be present, use {@link #get()}
   * instead. For a default value of {@code null}, use {@link #orNull}.
   *
   * <p>Note about generics: The signature {@code public T or(T defaultValue)} is overly
   * restrictive. However, the ideal signature, {@code public <S super T> S or(S)}, is not legal

    Class<? super T> rawType = type.getRawType();
    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // Assume all default values are generics safe.
    T defaultValue = (T) defaultValues.getInstance(rawType);
    if (defaultValue != null) {
      return defaultValue;
    }
    @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // ArbitraryInstances always returns generics-safe dummies.
    T value = (T) ArbitraryInstances.get(rawType);
    if (value != null) {
      return value;

   * {@code [1]} and {@code [1, 1]}).
   */
  // Note: 90% of the time we don't add type parameters or wildcards that serve only to "tweak" the
  // desired return type. However, *nested* generics introduce a special class of problems that we
  // think tip it over into being worthwhile.
  public static <T extends @Nullable Object, S extends T> Comparator<Iterable<S>> lexicographical(
      Comparator<T> comparator) {

#### Generic-типы

Эти типы принимают параметры в квадратных скобках:

* `List`
* `Tuple`
* `Set`
* `Dict`
* `Optional`
* ...и др.

называются **Generic-типами** или **Generics**.

### Классы как типы

Вы также можете объявить класс как тип переменной.

Допустим, у вас есть класс `Person` с полем `name`:

```Python hl_lines="1-3"

#### Generic tipler

Köşeli parantez içinde tip parametreleri alan bu türler, örneğin:

* `List`
* `Tuple`
* `Set`
* `Dict`
* `Optional`
* ...and others.

**Generic types** yada  **Generics** olarak adlandırılır.

### Tip olarak Sınıflar

Bir değişkenin tipini bir sınıf ile bildirebilirsiniz.

Diyelim ki  `name` değerine sahip `Person` sınıfınız var:

```Python hl_lines="1-3"

   * {@code [1]} and {@code [1, 1]}).
   */
  // Note: 90% of the time we don't add type parameters or wildcards that serve only to "tweak" the
  // desired return type. However, *nested* generics introduce a special class of problems that we
  // think tip it over into being worthwhile.
  public static <T extends @Nullable Object, S extends T> Comparator<Iterable<S>> lexicographical(
      Comparator<T> comparator) {

 * will throw [IllegalStateException].
 *
 * Limitations:
 * - supports Java byte code only, not Kotlin
 * - does not support nested Java arrays as method parameters
 * - does not support generics with multiple bounds
 */
class ApiTypeProvider internal constructor(
    private val asmLevel: Int,
    private val incubatingAnnotationTypeDescriptor: String,
    private val repository: ClassBytesRepository,