for an OAuth2 password flow.

    The OAuth2 specification dictates that for a password flow the data should be
    collected using form data (instead of JSON) and that it should have the specific
    fields `username` and `password`.

    All the initialization parameters are extracted from the request.

    Read more about it in the

          <description>the full goal name</description>
        </field>
      </fields>
    </class>

    <class xdoc.anchorName="parameter">
      <name>Parameter</name>
      <version>1.0.0+</version>
      <description>A phase mapping definition.</description>
      <!-- see o.a.m.plugin.descriptor.Parameter -->
      <fields>
        <field>
          <name>name</name>
          <version>1.0.0+</version>

        "graphMode": "area",
        "justifyMode": "auto",
        "orientation": "horizontal",
        "reduceOptions": {
          "calcs": [
            "mean"
          ],
          "fields": "",
          "values": false
        },
        "textMode": "auto"
      },
      "pluginVersion": "10.1.5",
      "targets": [
        {
          "datasource": {
            "type": "prometheus",

				if dataType != jsonparser.String {
					return errors.New("sub: Expected string")
				}
				c.Subject, err = jsonparser.ParseString(value)
				return err
			}
		}
		// Ignore unknown fields
		return nil
	})
}

// MapClaims - implements custom unmarshaller
type MapClaims struct {
	AccessKey string `json:"accessKey,omitempty"`
	jwtgo.MapClaims
}

            int domainIdPointer = pacStream.readInt();

            // Skip some reserved fields
            pacStream.skipBytes(8);

            this.userAccountControl = pacStream.readInt();

            // Skip some reserved fields
            pacStream.skipBytes(28);

            // Extra SIDs information
            int extraSidCount = pacStream.readInt();

      /*
       * The following static final fields exist for performance reasons.
       *
       * In UnsignedBytesBenchmark, accessing the following objects via static final fields is the
       * fastest (more than twice as fast as the Java implementation, vs ~1.5x with non-final static
       * fields, on x86_32) under the Hotspot server compiler. The reason is obviously that the
       * non-final fields need to be reloaded inside the loop.
       *

				return fmt.Errorf("Invalid according to Policy: Extra input fields: %s", key)
			}
		}
	}

	// Flag to indicate if all policies conditions are satisfied
	var condPassed bool

	// Iterate over policy conditions and check them against received form fields
	for _, policy := range postPolicyForm.Conditions.Policies {
		// Form fields names are in canonical format, convert conditions names

            }
            return pair;
        }).forEach(additionalDefaultList::add));
    }

    public void setNotAnalyzedFields(final String[] fields) {
        notAnalyzedFieldSet = new HashSet<>();
        Collections.addAll(notAnalyzedFieldSet, fields);
    }

    protected boolean isSortField(final String field) {
        for (final String f : sortFields) {
            if (f.equals(field)) {

            "detail": [
                {
                    "type": "model_attributes_type",
                    "loc": ["body"],
                    "msg": "Input should be a valid dictionary or object to extract fields from",
                    "input": "name=Foo&price=50.5",
                }
            ]
        }
    ) | IsDict(
        # TODO: remove when deprecating Pydantic v1
        {
            "detail": [

            "detail": [
                {
                    "type": "model_attributes_type",
                    "loc": ["body"],
                    "msg": "Input should be a valid dictionary or object to extract fields from",
                    "input": "name=Foo&price=50.5",
                }
            ]
        }
    ) | IsDict(
        # TODO: remove when deprecating Pydantic v1
        {
            "detail": [