assertFalse(
        "Maps of different sizes should not be equal.", getMap().equals(newHashMap(fewerEntries)));
  }

  public void testEquals_largerMap() {
    Collection<Entry<K, V>> moreEntries = getSampleEntries(getNumEntries() + 1);
    assertFalse(
        "Maps of different sizes should not be equal.", getMap().equals(newHashMap(moreEntries)));
  }

TODO

- dealing with processing of input and adapting GAVs before searching i.e. plugin groups in Maven and default searching
- how to deal with resolution from different places like local/remote/workspace
- how to incorporate the metadata processor to start with
- create a hook to programmatically configure the test
- create a plugin processor
- directory
- jar
- hooks for loading

message IngressClassSpec {
  // controller refers to the name of the controller that should handle this
  // class. This allows for different "flavors" that are controlled by the
  // same controller. For example, you may have different parameters for the
  // same implementing controller. This should be specified as a
  // domain-prefixed path no more than 250 characters in length, e.g.

		ShouldPass: false,
	}, // 1
	{
		SealExtKey: [32]byte{}, SealIV: [32]byte{}, SealDomain: "SSE-S3", SealBucket: "bucket", SealObject: "object",
		UnsealExtKey: [32]byte{}, UnsealDomain: "SSE-C", UnsealBucket: "bucket", UnsealObject: "object", // different domain
		ShouldPass: false,
	}, // 2
	{

    Test that plugin executions are properly merged during inheritance, even if the child uses a different
    plugin version than the parent.
  </description>

  <build>
    <plugins>
      <plugin>
        <groupId>org.apache.maven.its.plugins</groupId>
        <artifactId>maven-it-plugin-a</artifactId>
        <!-- NOTE: Use different version than parent -->
        <version>2.0</version>
        <executions>
          <execution>

import junit.framework.TestCase;
import junit.framework.TestSuite;

/**
 * Tests our AtomicHelper fallback strategies in AbstractFuture.
 *
 * <p>On different platforms AbstractFuture uses different strategies for its core synchronization
 * primitives. The strategies are all implemented as subtypes of AtomicHelper and the strategy is

 * different signatures.
 */
@GwtCompatible(emulated = true)
@J2ktIncompatible // Super-sourced
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
abstract class GwtFuturesCatchingSpecialization {
  /*
   * This server copy of the class is empty. The corresponding GWT copy contains alternative
   * versions of catching() and catchingAsync() with slightly different signatures from the ones
   * found in Futures.java.

in taking those formats, modifying them, and/or converting them to intermediate
formats that can be processed by TensorFlow.

These modifications and conversions are handled by a variety of libraries that
have different security properties and provide different levels of confidence
when dealing with untrusted data. Based on the security history of these
libraries we consider that it is safe to work with untrusted inputs for PNG,

    }

    if (addr != null) {
      return new HostSpecifier(InetAddresses.toUriString(addr));
    }

    // It is not any kind of IP address; must be a domain name or invalid.

    // TODO(user): different versions of this for different factories?
    InternetDomainName domain = InternetDomainName.from(host);

    if (domain.hasPublicSuffix()) {
      return new HostSpecifier(domain.toString());
    }

 * com.google.common.collect.testing.FeatureSpecificTestSuiteBuilder#withFeatures(Feature...)}),
 * this annotation specifies each of the different sizes for which a test suite should be built. (In
 * a typical case, the features should include {@link CollectionSize#ANY}.) These semantics are thus
 * a little different from those of other Collection-related features such as {@link
 * CollectionFeature} or {@link SetFeature}.
 *