return 0;
      }
    }

    /**
     * Removes exactly the specified number of occurrences of {@code element}, or makes no change if
     * this is not possible.
     *
     * <p>This method, in contrast to {@link #remove(Object, int)}, has no effect when the element
     * count is smaller than {@code occurrences}.
     *
     * @param element the element to remove

    //
    // Note: According to the spec, a NumberFormatException is thrown for a number that is not
    // parseable, but the spec doesn't seem to say which exception is thrown for an invalid radix.
    // In contrast to the JVM, Kotlin native throws an Illegal argument exception in this case
    // (which seems to make more sense).
    try {
      UnsignedInts.parseUnsignedInt("0", Character.MIN_RADIX - 1);
      fail();

     * this is no worse than what FutureTask does in that situation. Additionally, because the
     * Future was cancelled, its listeners have been run, so its consumers will not hang.
     *
     * Contrast this to the situation we have if setResult() throws, a situation described below.
     */
    I sourceResult;
    try {
      sourceResult = getDone(localInputFuture);
    } catch (CancellationException e) {

  /**
   * Scary constructor for ContiguousSet. This constructor (in this file, the GWT emulation of
   * ImmutableSortedSet) creates an empty sortedDelegate, which, in a vacuum, sets this object's
   * contents to empty. By contrast, the non-GWT constructor with the same signature uses the
   * comparator only as a comparator. It does NOT assume empty contents. (It requires an

        return 0;
      }
    }
  }

  /**
   * Removes exactly the specified number of occurrences of {@code element}, or makes no change if
   * this is not possible.
   *
   * <p>This method, in contrast to {@link #remove(Object, int)}, has no effect when the element
   * count is smaller than {@code occurrences}.
   *
   * @param element the element to remove

   * returns. This method may be useful when testing the garbage collection mechanism itself, or
   * inhibiting a spontaneous GC initiation in subsequent code.
   *
   * <p>In contrast, a plain call to {@link java.lang.System#gc()} does not ensure finalization
   * processing and may run concurrently, for example, if the JVM flag {@code
   * -XX:+ExplicitGCInvokesConcurrent} is used.
   *

### High availability

A stand-alone MinIO server would go down if the server hosting the drives goes offline. In contrast, a distributed MinIO setup with _m_ servers and _n_ drives will have your data safe as long as _m/2_ servers or _m*n_/2 or more drives are online.

 *       not return {@code Future} objects, so it doesn't support interruption directly, either.
 *       However, utilities that <i>use</i> that executor have the ability to interrupt tasks
 *       running on it. This class, by contrast, does not expose an {@code Executor} API.)
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>If you don't need the features of this class, you may prefer {@code newSequentialExecutor} for
 * its simplicity and ability to accommodate interruption.
 *

 * all threads. Note, however, that it does not guarantee fairness.
 *
 * <p>Rate limiters are often used to restrict the rate at which some physical or logical resource
 * is accessed. This is in contrast to {@link java.util.concurrent.Semaphore} which restricts the
 * number of concurrent accesses instead of the rate (note though that concurrency and rate are

In contrast to a "**container image**" that is the stored static contents, a "**container**" normally refers to the running instance, the thing that is being **executed**.