*       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code

 *     ...
 *   }
 * }
 * </pre>
 *
 * <p>The return value of {@code Lists.newArrayList(E[])} has GWT serializable type. It is also
 * useful in specifying contracts of interface methods. In the following example,
 *
 * <pre>
 * {@literal @}GwtCompatible
 * interface ListFactory {
 *   ...
 *   {@literal @}GwtCompatible(serializable = true)

  protected void tearDown() {
    tearDownStack.runTearDown();
  }

  /**
   * This first test doesn't test anything in Uninterruptibles, just demonstrates some normal
   * behavior of futures so that you can contrast the next test with it.
   */
  public void testRegularFutureInterrupted() throws ExecutionException {

    /*
     * Here's the order of events that we want.
     *

                /*
                 * This is purely for backward-compat with 2.x where <extensions> consisting of a single artifact where
                 * loaded into the core and hence available to plugins, in contrast to bigger extensions that were
                 * loaded into a dedicated realm which is invisible to plugins (MNG-2749).
                 */
                publicArtifacts.addAll(artifacts);
            }
        }

  protected void tearDown() {
    tearDownStack.runTearDown();
  }

  /**
   * This first test doesn't test anything in Uninterruptibles, just demonstrates some normal
   * behavior of futures so that you can contrast the next test with it.
   */
  public void testRegularFutureInterrupted() throws ExecutionException {

    /*
     * Here's the order of events that we want.
     *

   *
   * @throws NumberFormatException if the string does not contain a valid unsigned {@code long}
   *     value
   * @throws NullPointerException if {@code string} is null (in contrast to {@link
   *     Long#parseLong(String)})
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public static long parseUnsignedLong(String string) {
    return parseUnsignedLong(string, 10);
  }

  /**

   *
   * @throws NumberFormatException if the string does not contain a valid unsigned {@code byte}
   *     value
   * @throws NullPointerException if {@code string} is null (in contrast to {@link
   *     Byte#parseByte(String)})
   * @since 13.0
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public static byte parseUnsignedByte(String string) {
    return parseUnsignedByte(string, 10);
  }

  /**

* la réplication (le nombre de processus en cours d'exécution)
* la mémoire
* les étapes précédant le démarrage

 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},
 *       typically because the type forbids nullable type arguments: For example, {@code