}

  public void testOfInstance_equals() {
    new EqualsTester()
        .addEqualityGroup(Suppliers.ofInstance("foo"), Suppliers.ofInstance("foo"))
        .addEqualityGroup(Suppliers.ofInstance("bar"))
        .testEquals();
  }

  public void testCompose_equals() {
    new EqualsTester()
        .addEqualityGroup(
            Suppliers.compose(Functions.constant(1), Suppliers.ofInstance("foo")),

  /** Tests that if specify '%' as safe the result is an idempotent escaper. */
  public void testCustomEscaper_withpercent() {
    UnicodeEscaper e = new PercentEscaper("%", false);
    assertEquals("foo%7Cbar", e.escape("foo|bar"));
    assertEquals("foo%7Cbar", e.escape("foo%7Cbar")); // idempotent
  }

  /** Test that giving a null 'safeChars' string causes a {@link NullPointerException}. */
  public void testBadArguments_null() {
    try {

    this.predecessor = null;
    this.successor = null;
    return result;
  }

  /*
   * For discussion of the safety of the following methods for operating on predecessors and
   * successors, see the comments near the end of CompactHashMap, noting that the methods here call
   * requirePredecessors() and requireSuccessors(), which are defined at the end of this file.
   */

  private int getPredecessor(int entry) {

    class Bar<T> {}
    class SubBar<T> extends Bar<T> {
      @SuppressWarnings("unused")
      Bar<T> delegate;

      TypeToken<SubBar<T>> fieldTypeAsSubBar() {
        return new TypeToken<SubBar<T>>() {};
      }
    }

    Field delegateField = SubBar.class.getDeclaredField("delegate");
    // barType is Bar<T>, a ParameterizedType with no generic arguments specified

   *
   * <pre>{@code
   * static final ImmutableTable<Integer, Character, String> SPREADSHEET =
   *     new ImmutableTable.Builder<Integer, Character, String>()
   *         .put(1, 'A', "foo")
   *         .put(1, 'B', "bar")
   *         .put(2, 'A', "baz")
   *         .buildOrThrow();
   * }</pre>
   *
   * <p>By default, the order in which cells are added to the builder determines the iteration

    for (int i = 0; i < elementCount; i++) {
      E element = (E) stream.readObject();
      add(element);
    }
  }

  /*
   * For discussion of the safety of the following methods, see the comments near the end of
   * CompactHashMap.
   */

  private Object requireTable() {
    return requireNonNull(table);
  }

  private int[] requireEntries() {
    return requireNonNull(entries);
  }

    RuntimeException exception2 = new IllegalStateException("exception from stream 2");
    RuntimeException exception3 = new ArithmeticException("exception from stream 3");
    Stream<String> stream1 = Stream.of("foo", "bar").onClose(doThrow(exception1));
    Stream<String> stream2 = Stream.of("baz", "buh").onClose(doThrow(exception2));
    Stream<String> stream3 = Stream.of("quux").onClose(doThrow(exception3));
    RuntimeException exception = null;

        // didn't see it, trying to put it instead...
        Dummy sneaky = map.putIfAbsent(sample, Dummy.VALUE);
        if (sneaky == null) {
          return sample;
        } else {
          /* Someone beat us to it! Trying again...
           *
           * Technically this loop not guaranteed to terminate, so theoretically (extremely
           * unlikely) this thread might starve, but even then, there is always going to be another

        just a feature that seems like a sensible addition to Guava?


        Before new features get added to Guava, we really want to be sure that it's for a use case
        that actually comes up in the real world. We want to hear the real-world use case so the
        community can discuss and debate whether this feature is actually the *best* way to address
        the real use case, or whether or not a different abstraction might be more appropriate.

            <checkTestClasses>true</checkTestClasses>
            <signature>
              <groupId>com.toasttab.android</groupId>
              <artifactId>gummy-bears-api-19</artifactId>
              <version>0.6.1</version>
              <!-- TODO(cpovirk): In principle, it would make sense to *also* test compatibility with JDK 1.8, since guava-android also has JRE users. -->