from fastapi import APIRouter, FastAPI
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient


def test_redirect_slashes_enabled():
    app = FastAPI()
    router = APIRouter()

    @router.get("/hello/")
    def hello_page() -> str:
        return "Hello, World!"

    app.include_router(router)

    client = TestClient(app)

    response = client.get("/hello/", follow_redirects=False)
    assert response.status_code == 200

)
router_b_override.include_router(router_b_a, prefix="/a")
router_a.include_router(router_a_a, prefix="/a")
router_a.include_router(
    router_a_b_override, prefix="/b", default_response_class=PlainTextResponse
)
app.include_router(router_a, prefix="/a")
app.include_router(
    router_b_override, prefix="/b", default_response_class=PlainTextResponse
)


client = TestClient(app)

from fastapi import APIRouter, FastAPI
from fastapi.testclient import TestClient

app = FastAPI()

router = APIRouter()


@router.get("/users/{id}")
def read_user(segment: str, id: str):
    return {"segment": segment, "id": id}


app.include_router(router, prefix="/{segment}")


client = TestClient(app)


def test_get():
    response = client.get("/seg/users/foo")

Ben Leggett <******@****.***> 1706301268 -0500

fyuan1316 <******@****.***> 1710408745 +0800

Harshavardhana <******@****.***> 1694618076 -0700

    callbacks=callback_router3.routes,
)

router2_override.include_router(router4_override)

router2_override.include_router(router4_default)

router2_default.include_router(
    router4_override,
    prefix="/level3",
    tags=["level3a", "level3b"],
    dependencies=[Depends(dep3)],
    responses={
        403: {"description": "Client error level 3"},
        503: {"description": "Server error level 3"},

Harshavardhana <******@****.***> 1712330228 -0700

The same way you can include an `APIRouter` in a `FastAPI` application, you can include an `APIRouter` in another `APIRouter` using:

```Python
router.include_router(other_router)
```

 *       Guava while continuing to run it internally, as we do with many other tests. This would
 *       suffice because we our Android users and tests are using the open-source version, which
 *       would no longer have the problematic test. But why bother when we can instead strip it with
 *       a more precisely named annotation?