Java package; see https://goo.gl/pRV3Yn for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one
    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for

      <subscribe>subscribe@</subscribe>
      <unsubscribe>unsubscribe@</unsubscribe>
      <post>post@</post>
      <archive>mail-archive</archive>
      <otherArchives>
        <otherArchive>other-archive</otherArchive>
      </otherArchives>
    </mailingList>
  </mailingLists>

  <prerequisites>
    <maven>2.0.1</maven>
  </prerequisites>

  <scm>
    <url>https://project.url/trunk</url>

    Java package; see https://goo.gl/pRV3Yn for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one
    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for

    Java package; see https://goo.gl/pRV3Yn for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one
    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for

    Java package; see https://goo.gl/pRV3Yn for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one
    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for

    Java package; see https://goo.gl/pRV3Yn for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one
    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for

    Java package; see https://goo.gl/pRV3Yn for details.

    The summary is that it ignores one file in favor of the other.
    util.concurrent, like nearly all our packages, has two .gwt.xml files: one
    for prod and one for tests. However, unlike our other packages, as of this
    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for

  <version>1.0</version>
  <name>Guava ListenableFuture only</name>
  <description>
    Contains Guava's com.google.common.util.concurrent.ListenableFuture class,
    without any of its other classes -- but is also available in a second
    "version" that omits the class to avoid conflicts with the copy in Guava
    itself. The idea is:

    - If users want only ListenableFuture, they depend on listenablefuture-1.0.

  <version>1.0-SNAPSHOT</version>

  <name>Maven Integration Test :: MNG-4053</name>
  <description>
    Verify that attributes in plugin configuration elements are not erroneously duplicated to other elements when
    no plugin management is used.
  </description>

  <build>
    <!-- NOTE: This test does not use plugin management for the IT plugin -->
    <plugins>
      <plugin>

         configurations downstream, and GWT uses the runtime configuration for
         its builds. Thus, GWT doesn't get j2objc-annotations transitively, in
         contrast to the other deps of `guava`, which it does get transitively.
         (Arguably we should redeclare *all* the `guava` deps here.) -->
    <dependency>
      <groupId>com.google.j2objc</groupId>