import javax.annotation.CheckForNull;
import org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable;

/**
 * A deque which forwards all its method calls to another deque. Subclasses should override one or
 * more methods to modify the behavior of the backing deque as desired per the <a
 * href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decorator_pattern">decorator pattern</a>.
 *

    <version>HEAD-android-SNAPSHOT</version>
  </parent>
  <artifactId>guava-testlib</artifactId>
  <name>Guava Testing Library</name>
  <description>
    Guava testlib is a set of java classes used for more convenient
    unit testing - particularly to assist the tests for Guava itself.
  </description>
  <dependencies>
    <dependency>
      <groupId>com.google.code.findbugs</groupId>
      <artifactId>jsr305</artifactId>

        new SimpleForwardingListenableFuture<String>(immediateFuture("a")) {};
    verify(!(f instanceof FluentFuture));
    assertThat(FluentFuture.from(f).get()).isEqualTo("a");
    // TODO(cpovirk): Test forwarding more extensively.
  }

  public void testAddCallback() {
    FluentFuture<String> f = FluentFuture.from(immediateFuture("a"));
    final boolean[] called = new boolean[1];
    f.addCallback(

    assertThat(cache.asMap().keySet()).containsExactly(2, 4);

    CacheTesting.processPendingNotifications(cache);
    assertThat(removalListener.getCount()).isEqualTo(2);

    // Should we pepper more of these calls throughout the above? Where?
    CacheTesting.checkValidState(cache);
  }

  /**
   * Tests that when a single entry exceeds the segment's max weight, the new entry is immediately

 *       suffice because we our Android users and tests are using the open-source version, which
 *       would no longer have the problematic test. But why bother when we can instead strip it with
 *       a more precisely named annotation?
 *   <li>While a dependency on Android ought to be easy if it's for annotations only, it will
 *       probably require adding the dep to various ACLs, license files, and Proguard

  public abstract static class Builder<E> {

    Builder() {}

    static int expandedCapacity(int oldCapacity, int minCapacity) {
      if (minCapacity < 0) {
        throw new AssertionError("cannot store more than MAX_VALUE elements");
      }
      // careful of overflow!
      int newCapacity = oldCapacity + (oldCapacity >> 1) + 1;
      if (newCapacity < minCapacity) {

import java.util.Queue;
import javax.annotation.CheckForNull;
import org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable;

/**
 * A queue which forwards all its method calls to another queue. Subclasses should override one or
 * more methods to modify the behavior of the backing queue as desired per the <a
 * href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decorator_pattern">decorator pattern</a>.
 *

import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit;
import javax.annotation.CheckForNull;

/**
 * A {@link BlockingDeque} which forwards all its method calls to another {@code BlockingDeque}.
 * Subclasses should override one or more methods to modify the behavior of the backing deque as
 * desired per the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decorator_pattern">decorator pattern</a>.
 *

/**
 * A synchronization abstraction supporting waiting on arbitrary boolean conditions.
 *
 * <p>This class is intended as a replacement for {@link ReentrantLock}. Code using {@code Monitor}
 * is less error-prone and more readable than code using {@code ReentrantLock}, without significant
 * performance loss. {@code Monitor} even has the potential for performance gain by optimizing the
 * evaluation and signaling of conditions. Signaling is entirely <a

import javax.annotation.CheckForNull;
import org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable;

/**
 * A map entry which forwards all its method calls to another map entry. Subclasses should override
 * one or more methods to modify the behavior of the backing map entry as desired per the <a
 * href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decorator_pattern">decorator pattern</a>.
 *