- kubelet <= v1.24.16

**Fixed Versions**:
  - kubelet v1.28.1
  - kubelet v1.27.5
  - kubelet v1.26.8
  - kubelet v1.25.13
  - kubelet v1.24.17

This vulnerability was discovered by James Sturtevant @jsturtevant and Mark Rossetti @marosset during the process of fixing CVE-2023-3676 (that original CVE was reported by Tomer Peled @tomerpeled92)

      the terms of any separate license agreement you may have executed
      with Licensor regarding such Contributions.

   6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade
      names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of the Licensor,
      except as required for reasonable and customary use in describing the
      origin of the Work and reproducing the content of the NOTICE file.

      the terms of any separate license agreement you may have executed
      with Licensor regarding such Contributions.

   6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade
      names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of the Licensor,
      except as required for reasonable and customary use in describing the
      origin of the Work and reproducing the content of the NOTICE file.

     * outlined in RFC 2046. In forms, there are a series of fields to be supplied by the user who
     * fills out the form. Each field has a name. Within a given form, the names are unique.
     */
    @JvmField
    val FORM = "multipart/form-data".toMediaType()

    private val COLONSPACE = byteArrayOf(':'.code.toByte(), ' '.code.toByte())

## Documenting webhooks with **FastAPI** and OpenAPI

With **FastAPI**, using OpenAPI, you can define the names of these webhooks, the types of HTTP operations that your app can send (e.g. `POST`, `PUT`, etc.) and the request **bodies** that your app would send.

As code duplication increments the chances of bugs, security issues, code desynchronization issues (when you update in one place but not in the others), etc.

And these models are all sharing a lot of the data and duplicating attribute names and types.

We could do better.

We can declare a `UserBase` model that serves as a base for our other models. And then we can make subclasses of that model that inherit its attributes (type declarations, validation, etc).

 *
 *  2. If there is a connection in the pool that can satisfy the request it is used. Note that it is
 *     possible for shared exchanges to make requests to different host names! See
 *     [RealConnection.isEligible] for details.
 *
 *  3. Attempt plans from prior connect attempts for this call. These occur as either follow-ups to

            // there is no way to properly map KtModule to ModuleDescriptor,
            // Multi-module [KtFe10AnalysisHandlerExtension]s are used only for tests,
            // so just by name comparison should work as all module names are different
            return null
        }

        resolveSession = componentProvider.get()
        deprecationResolver = componentProvider.get()
        callResolver = componentProvider.get()

private
typealias ClassBytesSupplier = () -> ByteArray


private
typealias ClassBytesIndex = (String) -> ClassBytesSupplier?


/**
 * Repository providing access to class bytes by Kotlin source names.
 *
 * Follows the one directory per package name segment convention.
 * Keeps JAR files open for fast lookup, must be closed.
 *
 * Always include the current JVM platform loader for which no JAR file can be held open.

## Nested Models

Each attribute of a Pydantic model has a type.

But that type can itself be another Pydantic model.

So, you can declare deeply nested JSON "objects" with specific attribute names, types and validations.

All that, arbitrarily nested.

### Define a submodel

For example, we can define an `Image` model:

=== "Python 3.10+"

    ```Python hl_lines="7-9"