MINIO_IDENTITY_OPENID_REDIRECT_URI          (string)    [DEPRECATED use env 'MINIO_BROWSER_REDIRECT_URL'] Configure custom redirect_uri for OpenID login flow callback
MINIO_IDENTITY_OPENID_COMMENT               (sentence)  optionally add a comment to this setting
```

### Access Control Configuration Variables

  # Options for controlling the logger.
  logger:
    level: "debug"
    format: "text" # can also be "json"

# Default values shown below
oauth2:
  # use ["code", "token", "id_token"] to enable implicit flow for web-only clients
  responseTypes: [ "code", "token", "id_token" ] # also allowed are "token" and "id_token"
  # By default, Dex will ask for approval to share data with application

                        break;
                    }
                } catch (Exception e) {
                    break; // Why are we just ignoring this exception? Are exceptions are being used for flow control
                }
            }
        }
    }

Am häufigsten ist der „Implicit“-Flow.

Am sichersten ist der „Code“-Flow, die Implementierung ist jedoch komplexer, da mehr Schritte erforderlich sind. Da er komplexer ist, schlagen viele Anbieter letztendlich den „Implicit“-Flow vor.

!!! note "Hinweis"

      </Credentials>
   </AssumeRoleWithCertificateResult>
   <ResponseMetadata>
      <RequestId>169339CD8B3A6948</RequestId>
   </ResponseMetadata>
</AssumeRoleWithCertificateResponse>
```

## Authentication Flow

A client can request temp. S3 credentials via the STS API. It can authenticate via a client certificate and obtain a access/secret key pair as well as a session token. These credentials are associated to an S3 policy at the MinIO server.

        * `implicit`
        * `clientCredentials`
        * `authorizationCode`
    * But there is one specific "flow" that can be perfectly used for handling authentication in the same application directly:
        * `password`: some next chapters will cover examples of this.

    ```Python hl_lines="7"
    {!> ../../../docs_src/request_forms/tutorial001.py!}
    ```

For example, in one of the ways the OAuth2 specification can be used (called "password flow") it is required to send a `username` and `password` as form fields.

The <abbr title="specification">spec</abbr> requires the fields to be exactly named `username` and `password`, and to be sent as form fields, not JSON.

    ```Python hl_lines="7"
    {!> ../../../docs_src/request_forms/tutorial001.py!}
    ```

Zum Beispiel stellt eine der Möglichkeiten, die OAuth2 Spezifikation zu verwenden (genannt <abbr title='„Passwort-Fluss“'>„password flow“</abbr>), die Bedingung, einen `username` und ein `password` als Formularfelder zu senden.

 *  Fix: Don't lose HTTP/2 flow control bytes when incoming data races with a stream close. If this
    happened enough then eventually the connection would stall.

 *  Fix: Acknowledge and apply inbound HTTP/2 settings atomically. Previously we had a race where we
    could use new flow control capacity before acknowledging it, causing strict HTTP/2 servers to
    fail the call.

 * of EventBus may be better written using <a
 * href="https://kotlinlang.org/docs/coroutines-guide.html">Kotlin coroutines</a>, including <a
 * href="https://kotlinlang.org/docs/flow.html">Flow</a> and <a
 * href="https://kotlinlang.org/docs/channels.html">Channels</a>. Yet other usages are better served
 * by individual libraries that provide specialized support for particular use cases.
 *