* elements directly and null for empty positions, we store indices of the keys in the hash table,
   * and ABSENT for empty positions.  We then look up the keys in alternatingKeysAndValues.
   *
   * (The index actually stored is the index of the key in alternatingKeysAndValues, which is
   * double the index of the entry in entrySet.asList.)
   *

        policy.handlePotentialDeadlock(exception);
        return;
      }
      // Otherwise, it's the first time seeing this lock relationship. Look for
      // a path from the acquiredLock to this.
      Set<LockGraphNode> seen = Sets.newIdentityHashSet();
      ExampleStackTrace path = acquiredLock.findPathTo(this, seen);

      if (path == null) {

    protected ScheduledJobService scheduledJobService;

    // ===================================================================================
    //                                                                               Hook
    //                                                                              ======
    @Override
    protected void setupHtmlData(final ActionRuntime runtime) {
        super.setupHtmlData(runtime);

  //
  // 1. What about leaving/unlocking? Are you going to do
  //    guard.enter() paired with monitor.leave()? That might get
  //    confusing. It's nice for the finally block to look as close as
  //    possible to the thing right before the try. You could have
  //    guard.leave(), but that's a little odd as well because the
  //    guard doesn't have anything to do with leaving. You can't

   * }</pre>
   */
  private static final SuccessorsFunction<Character> TREE =
      createDirectedGraph("hd", "he", "hg", "da", "db", "dc", "gf");

  /**
   * Two disjoint tree-shaped graphs that look as follows (all edges are directed facing downwards):
   *
   * <pre>{@code
   * a   c
   * |   |
   * |   |
   * b   d
   * }</pre>
   */

              | (1L << (41 - 2))
              | (1L << (43 - 2))
              | (1L << (47 - 2))
              | (1L << (53 - 2))
              | (1L << (59 - 2))
              | (1L << (61 - 2));
      // Look up n within the mask.
      return ((mask >> ((int) n - 2)) & 1) != 0;
    }

    if ((SIEVE_30 & (1 << (n % 30))) != 0) {
      return false;
    }
    if (n % 7 == 0 || n % 11 == 0 || n % 13 == 0) {

       * to test it.
       */
      return;
    }

    /*
     * Only under Windows (or hypothetically when running with some other non-POSIX, ACL-based
     * filesystem) does our prod code look up the username. Thus, this test doesn't necessarily test
     * anything interesting under most environments. Still, we can run it (except for Android, at

    //

    // ===================================================================================
    //                                                                               Hook
    //                                                                              ======

    // ===================================================================================

  // yet visit a variety of "values-relative-to-the-next-power-of-2"
  @Param({"5", "30", "180", "1100", "6900", "43000", "260000"}) // "1600000", "9800000"
  private int size;

  // TODO(kevinb): look at exact (==) hits vs. equals() hits?
  @Param({"0.2", "0.8"})
  private double hitRate;

  @Param("true")
  private boolean isUserTypeFast;

  // "" means no fixed seed
  @Param("")

  // yet visit a variety of "values-relative-to-the-next-power-of-2"
  @Param({"5", "30", "180", "1100", "6900", "43000", "260000"}) // "1600000", "9800000"
  private int size;

  // TODO(kevinb): look at exact (==) hits vs. equals() hits?
  @Param({"0.2", "0.8"})
  private double hitRate;

  @Param("true")
  private boolean isUserTypeFast;

  // "" means no fixed seed
  @Param("")