* of the access check algorithm used by Windows is required. The following
 * is a basic description of the algorithm. For a more complete description
 * we recommend reading the section on Access Control in Keith Brown's
 * "The .NET Developer's Guide to Windows Security" (which is also
 * available online).
 * <p>
 * Direct ACEs are evaluated first in order. The SID of the user performing

        };
    assertCrc(0xd9963a56, scsiReadCommand);
  }

  // Known values from http://www.evanjones.ca/crc32c.html
  public void testSomeOtherKnownValues() {
    assertCrc(0x22620404, "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog".getBytes(UTF_8));
    assertCrc(0xE3069283, "123456789".getBytes(UTF_8));
    assertCrc(0xf3dbd4fe, "1234567890".getBytes(UTF_8));
    assertCrc(0xBFE92A83, "23456789".getBytes(UTF_8));
  }

  }

  public void testExplicit_ordering_dupes() {
    SortedSet<String> set =
        ImmutableSortedSet.orderedBy(STRING_LENGTH)
            .add("in", "the", "quick", "brown", "fox", "jumped", "over", "a", "lazy", "dog")
            .build();
    assertThat(set).containsExactly("a", "in", "the", "over", "quick", "jumped").inOrder();
  }

  public void testExplicit_contains() {

  }

  public void testExplicit_ordering_dupes() {
    SortedSet<String> set =
        ImmutableSortedSet.orderedBy(STRING_LENGTH)
            .add("in", "the", "quick", "brown", "fox", "jumped", "over", "a", "lazy", "dog")
            .build();
    assertThat(set).containsExactly("a", "in", "the", "over", "quick", "jumped").inOrder();
  }

  public void testExplicit_contains() {

     * cause a concurrent read operation to see inconsistent data. This is made easier by the
     * nature of the read operations in Map. For example, no operation can reveal that the table
     * has grown but the threshold has not yet been updated, so there are no atomicity requirements
     * for this with respect to reads.
     *
     * As a guide, all critical volatile reads and writes to the count field are marked in code

    int destSize = dest.length;
    int destIndex = 0;
    int lastEscape = 0;

    // Loop through the rest of the string, replacing when needed into the
    // destination buffer, which gets grown as needed as well.
    for (; index < slen; index++) {

      // Get a replacement for the current character.
      char[] r = escape(s.charAt(index));

      // If no replacement is needed, just continue.

     * concurrent read operation to see inconsistent data. This is made easier by the nature of the
     * read operations in Map. For example, no operation can reveal that the table has grown but the
     * threshold has not yet been updated, so there are no atomicity requirements for this with
     * respect to reads.
     *

     * concurrent read operation to see inconsistent data. This is made easier by the nature of the
     * read operations in Map. For example, no operation can reveal that the table has grown but the
     * threshold has not yet been updated, so there are no atomicity requirements for this with
     * respect to reads.
     *