throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
  }

  /**
   * Not supported. <b>You are attempting to create a map that may contain a non-{@code Comparable}
   * key.</b> Proper calls will resolve to the version in {@code ImmutableSortedMap}, not this dummy
   * version.
   *
   * @throws UnsupportedOperationException always
   * @deprecated <b>Pass a key of type {@code Comparable} to use {@link

   * traversal order of the collection's iterator.
   *
   * @param capacity the capacity of this queue
   * @param fair if {@code true} then queue accesses for threads blocked on insertion or removal,
   *     are processed in FIFO order; if {@code false} the access order is unspecified.
   * @param c the collection of elements to initially contain

    throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
  }

  /**
   * Not supported. <b>You are attempting to create a map that may contain a non-{@code Comparable}
   * key.</b> Proper calls will resolve to the version in {@code ImmutableSortedMap}, not this dummy
   * version.
   *
   * @throws UnsupportedOperationException always
   * @deprecated <b>Pass a key of type {@code Comparable} to use {@link

   *     {@code double}) in the proper order.
   */
  private void writeObject(java.io.ObjectOutputStream s) throws java.io.IOException {
    s.defaultWriteObject();

    // Write out array length
    int length = length();
    s.writeInt(length);

    // Write out all elements in the proper order.
    for (int i = 0; i < length; i++) {
      s.writeDouble(get(i));
    }

 * <ol>
 *   <li>remove();
 *   <li>hasNext()
 *   <li>hasNext();
 *   <li>remove();
 *   <li>next();
 * </ol>
 *
 * <p>This particular order of operations may be unrealistic, and testing all 3^5 of them may be
 * thought of as overkill; however, it's difficult to determine which proper subset of this massive
 * set would be sufficient to expose any possible bug. Brute force is simpler.
 *

 * <ol>
 *   <li>remove();
 *   <li>hasNext()
 *   <li>hasNext();
 *   <li>remove();
 *   <li>next();
 * </ol>
 *
 * <p>This particular order of operations may be unrealistic, and testing all 3^5 of them may be
 * thought of as overkill; however, it's difficult to determine which proper subset of this massive
 * set would be sufficient to expose any possible bug. Brute force is simpler.
 *

   * traversal order of the collection's iterator.
   *
   * @param capacity the capacity of this queue
   * @param fair if {@code true} then queue accesses for threads blocked on insertion or removal,
   *     are processed in FIFO order; if {@code false} the access order is unspecified.
   * @param c the collection of elements to initially contain

   * TestContainerGenerator#order(List)}. Tests should use this method only if they declare
   * requirement {@link com.google.common.collect.testing.features.CollectionFeature#KNOWN_ORDER}.
   */
  protected List<E> getOrderedElements() {
    List<E> list = new ArrayList<>();
    for (E e : getSubjectGenerator().order(new ArrayList<E>(getSampleElements()))) {
      list.add(e);
    }

      queryId = $("#queryId").val(),
      order = $(this).attr("data-order"),
      url = $(this).attr("href"),
      buf = [],
      hashIndex,
      hashStr;
    buf.push(contextPath);
    buf.push("/go/?rt=");
    buf.push(rt);
    buf.push("&docId=");
    buf.push(docId);
    buf.push("&queryId=");
    buf.push(queryId);
    buf.push("&order=");
    buf.push(order);

    hashIndex = url.indexOf("#");

   * TestContainerGenerator#order(List)}. Tests should use this method only if they declare
   * requirement {@link com.google.common.collect.testing.features.CollectionFeature#KNOWN_ORDER}.
   */
  protected List<E> getOrderedElements() {
    List<E> list = new ArrayList<>();
    for (E e : getSubjectGenerator().order(new ArrayList<E>(getSampleElements()))) {
      list.add(e);
    }