)

        return choice to choice.fromDer(reader)
      }

      override fun toDer(
        writer: DerWriter,
        value: Pair<DerAdapter<*>, Any?>,
      ) {
        val (adapter, v) = value
        (adapter as DerAdapter<Any?>).toDer(writer, v)
      }

      override fun toString(): String = choices.joinToString(separator = " OR ")

      }

      override fun fromDer(reader: DerReader): Long {
        val peekHeader =
          reader.peekHeader()
            ?: throw ProtocolException("expected time but was exhausted at $reader")

        return when {
          peekHeader.tagClass == Adapters.UTC_TIME.tagClass &&
            peekHeader.tag == Adapters.UTC_TIME.tag -> {
            Adapters.UTC_TIME.fromDer(reader)
          }

    throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
  }

  /**
   * Not supported. <b>You are attempting to create a map that may contain a non-{@code Comparable}
   * key.</b> Proper calls will resolve to the version in {@code ImmutableSortedMap}, not this dummy
   * version.
   *
   * @throws UnsupportedOperationException always
   * @deprecated <b>Pass a key of type {@code Comparable} to use {@link

    throw new UnsupportedOperationException();
  }

  /**
   * Not supported. <b>You are attempting to create a map that may contain a non-{@code Comparable}
   * key.</b> Proper calls will resolve to the version in {@code ImmutableSortedMap}, not this dummy
   * version.
   *
   * @throws UnsupportedOperationException always
   * @deprecated <b>Pass a key of type {@code Comparable} to use {@link

 * <ol>
 *   <li>remove();
 *   <li>hasNext()
 *   <li>hasNext();
 *   <li>remove();
 *   <li>next();
 * </ol>
 *
 * <p>This particular order of operations may be unrealistic, and testing all 3^5 of them may be
 * thought of as overkill; however, it's difficult to determine which proper subset of this massive
 * set would be sufficient to expose any possible bug. Brute force is simpler.
 *

 * <ol>
 *   <li>remove();
 *   <li>hasNext()
 *   <li>hasNext();
 *   <li>remove();
 *   <li>next();
 * </ol>
 *
 * <p>This particular order of operations may be unrealistic, and testing all 3^5 of them may be
 * thought of as overkill; however, it's difficult to determine which proper subset of this massive
 * set would be sufficient to expose any possible bug. Brute force is simpler.
 *

   * TestContainerGenerator#order(List)}. Tests should use this method only if they declare
   * requirement {@link com.google.common.collect.testing.features.CollectionFeature#KNOWN_ORDER}.
   */
  protected List<E> getOrderedElements() {
    List<E> list = new ArrayList<>();
    for (E e : getSubjectGenerator().order(new ArrayList<E>(getSampleElements()))) {
      list.add(e);
    }

   * TestContainerGenerator#order(List)}. Tests should use this method only if they declare
   * requirement {@link com.google.common.collect.testing.features.CollectionFeature#KNOWN_ORDER}.
   */
  protected List<E> getOrderedElements() {
    List<E> list = new ArrayList<>();
    for (E e : getSubjectGenerator().order(new ArrayList<E>(getSampleElements()))) {
      list.add(e);
    }

 * application-specific ordering in addition to performing general cycle detection.
 *
 * <p><strong>Garbage Collection</strong>
 *
 * <p>In order to allow proper garbage collection of unused locks, the edges of the lock graph are
 * weak references.
 *
 * <p><strong>Performance</strong>
 *

   *
   * Then we declare the getters for these fields as @GwtIncompatible so that no one can try to use
   * them under J2CL—or, as an unfortunate side effect, under GWT. We do still give the fields
   * themselves their proper values under GWT, since GWT's EnumMap does need the Class instance.
   *
   * Note that sometimes these fields *do* have correct values under J2CL: They will if the caller