"application/atom+xml",
				"application/atomcat+xml",
				"application/atomicmail",
				"application/atomsvc+xml",
				"application/auth-policy+xml",
				"application/batch-smtp",
				"application/beep+xml",
				"application/bizagi-modeler",
				"application/cals-1840",
				"application/ccxml+xml",
				"application/cea-2018+xml",
				"application/cellml+xml",
				"application/cnrp+xml",

 * socket that could receive both IPv4 and IPv6 connections (by disabling the {@code IPV6_V6ONLY}
 * socket option on an IPv6 socket). Yes, it's confusing. Nevertheless, these "mapped" addresses
 * were never supposed to be seen on the wire. That assumption was dropped, some say mistakenly, in
 * later RFCs with the apparent aim of making IPv4-to-IPv6 transition simpler.
 *

				3: {checkPartSuccess, checkPartSuccess, checkPartSuccess, checkPartFileNotFound},
			},
			expectedMeta:     fi,
			expectedDangling: false,
		},

		// Add new cases as seen
	}
	for _, testCase := range testCases {
		testCase := testCase
		t.Run(testCase.name, func(t *testing.T) {
			gotMeta, dangling := isObjectDangling(testCase.metaArr, testCase.errs, testCase.dataErrs)

          << "Failed to find expected control edge " << e.ToString()
          << " in fdef: " << fdef.DebugString();
    }

    // If caller specified all edges, check that we have seen all
    if (is_exact_edges) {
      ASSERT_EQ(e_edges.size() + c_edges.size(), a_edges.size())
          << "Expected edges: " << ToString(e_edges)
          << " Expected Control edges: " << ToString(c_edges)

			wantResult: `{"Id":1,"Name":"Anshu","Address":"Templestowe","Car":"Jeep"}`,
			withJSON:   `{ "person": [ { "Id": 1, "Name": "Anshu", "Address": "Templestowe", "Car": "Jeep" }, { "Id": 2, "Name": "Ben Mostafa", "Address": "Las Vegas", "Car": "Mustang" }, { "Id": 3, "Name": "Rohan Wood", "Address": "Wooddon", "Car": "VW" } ] }`,
		},
		{
			name:       "lower-case-is",

import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Map;
import junit.framework.TestCase;

/**
 * Test cases for {@link TypeToken}.
 *
 * @author Sven Mawson
 * @author Ben Yu
 */
@AndroidIncompatible // lots of failures, possibly some related to bad equals() implementations?
public class TypeTokenTest extends TestCase {

  private abstract static class StringList implements List<String> {}

A!t÷ù £ÇõäZôJ ÏæD˜—tX8={ ñ ‰møû)7YŠaú0 c¯€êFԦáìQÜ…ÛÙ EX$:Z[ˆ0Î?ˆtx|v  ØiuÉ«³©ºØ\| © U N‚_ ’³4ÃEh<Ϭ ¥’¹ “y (Cu”ý’.¥vé"ú`×®ü S’zU˜ ^S6¿Nöâaõ»à ðP@ ~uôÆ8 Ía®Á c° ¾±ÁYXîP°Á·ü¹²õ ò3»0ì“¥€cˆç ÞÒà ÈRk9*K¢¥ß w\^Ð I ,7‡ g’РĦüA {3Åý »á6 ô Òb\9ºŽÞ쳬ô¹,w…BÉé)uÌÊŠ ù?Z \œáýóLjä‹h óÌ îBM†,êó(†ayÇ °páËʸ[É Ÿ® vâ鱟§î= °A 6Ž?¨ È'uBAL ódb%bn e½ 1 ×¥³n¤f‚Y!‘~ï‰+ ÝïAëˆÎØyþú==Âz_æ~? c{|»pÛ¼ å7SB‹ÒåLZ0eö+]51´Zmză§îVû·hÏÓ p¡sæ× ,°†ÝI »9l‡:‚ã¾öÈN· 2°k² Ô0¤û5\³mW[mâ? ŽCܤ«‡¡j( {7T` X8 sbA'éY‹P 5z˜ù·|4,þ:KWˆø˜˜ò |°Vd?<õ‹...

viz] MMMM YYYY HH:mm",LLLL:"dddd, D [a viz] MMMM YYYY HH:mm"},calendar:{sameDay:"[Hiziv da] LT",nextDay:"[Warc\u02bchoazh da] LT",nextWeek:"dddd [da] LT",lastDay:"[Dec\u02bch da] LT",lastWeek:"dddd [paset da] LT",sameElse:"L"},relativeTime:{future:"a-benn %s",past:"%s \u02bczo",s:"un nebeud segondenno\xf9",ss:"%d eilenn",m:"ur vunutenn",mm:ws,h:"un eur",hh:"%d eur",d:"un devezh",dd:ws,M:"ur miz",MM:ws,y:"ur bloaz",yy:function(e){switch(function e(a){if(9<a)return e(a%10);return a}(e)){case 1:case 3:case...

    </magic>
    <glob pattern="*.bat"/>
    <glob pattern="*.cmd"/>
  </mime-type>

  <mime-type type="application/batch-smtp"/>
  <mime-type type="application/beep+xml"/>

  <mime-type type="application/bizagi-modeler">
    <_comment>BizAgi Process Modeler</_comment>
    <sub-class-of type="application/zip"/>
    <glob pattern="*.bpm"/>
  </mime-type>