///

### JSON Schema 的 `examples` 欄位 { #json-schemas-examples-field }

後來 JSON Schema 在新版本規範中新增了 [`examples`](https://json-schema.org/draft/2019-09/json-schema-validation.html#rfc.section.9.5) 欄位。

接著新的 OpenAPI 3.1.0 以最新版本（JSON Schema 2020-12）為基礎，該版本就包含這個新的 `examples` 欄位。

現在這個新的 `examples` 欄位優先於舊的單一（且客製）`example` 欄位，後者已被棄用。

        // Calculate expected HMAC-MD5 using standard Java MessageDigest for comparison
        // This is a simplified HMAC-MD5 calculation for comparison, not a full RFC 2104 implementation.
        // The HMACT64 implementation is what we are testing.
        MessageDigest md5 = MessageDigest.getInstance("MD5");
        byte[] ipad = new byte[64];
        byte[] opad = new byte[64];

			//
			// S3 uses B-encoding (Base64) for non-ASCII-heavy metadata and Q-encoding
			// (quoted-printable) for mostly ASCII strings. Long strings are split at word
			// boundaries to fit RFC 2047’s 75-character limit, ensuring HTTP parser
			// compatibility.
			//
			// However, this splitting increases header size and can introduce errors, unlike Go’s

///

### JSON Schemas Feld `examples` { #json-schemas-examples-field }

Aber dann fügte JSON Schema ein [`examples`](https://json-schema.org/draft/2019-09/json-schema-validation.html#rfc.section.9.5)-Feld zu einer neuen Version der Spezifikation hinzu.

Und dann basierte das neue OpenAPI 3.1.0 auf der neuesten Version (JSON Schema 2020-12), die dieses neue Feld `examples` enthielt.

/**
 * A Cache-Control header with cache directives from a server or client. These directives set policy
 * on what responses can be stored, and which requests can be satisfied by those stored responses.
 *
 * See [RFC 7234, 5.2](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7234#section-5.2).
 */
class CacheControl internal constructor(
  /**
   * In a response, this field's name "no-cache" is misleading. It doesn't prevent us from caching

///

### JSON Schema’nın `examples` alanı { #json-schemas-examples-field }

Sonrasında JSON Schema, spesifikasyonun yeni bir sürümüne [`examples`](https://json-schema.org/draft/2019-09/json-schema-validation.html#rfc.section.9.5) alanını ekledi.

Ardından yeni OpenAPI 3.1.0, bu yeni `examples` alanını içeren en güncel sürümü (JSON Schema 2020-12) temel aldı.

    // alternative subject starting with a japanese kanji character. This is
    // not supported by Android because the underlying implementation from
    // harmony follows the definition from rfc 1034 page 10 for alternative
    // subject names. This causes the code to drop all alternative subjects.
    assertThat(verifier.verify("bar.com", session)).isTrue()
    assertThat(verifier.verify("a.bar.com", session)).isFalse()

 *  Fix: Follow HTTP 307 and 308 redirects on methods other than GET and POST. We're reluctant to
    change OkHttp's behavior in handling common HTTP status codes, but this fix is overdue! The new
    behavior is now consistent with [RFC 7231][rfc_7231_647], which is newer than OkHttp itself.
    If you want this update with the old behavior use [this interceptor][legacy_interceptor].

///

### Поле `examples` у Схемі JSON { #json-schemas-examples-field }

Пізніше Схема JSON додала поле [`examples`](https://json-schema.org/draft/2019-09/json-schema-validation.html#rfc.section.9.5) у нову версію специфікації.

А потім новий OpenAPI 3.1.0 базувався на найновішій версії (JSON Schema 2020-12), яка включала це нове поле `examples`.

| com.squareup.okhttp3:mockwebserver:5.0.0         | okhttp3.mockwebserver | Obsolete. Depends on JUnit 4.     |

**OkHttp now supports Happy Eyeballs ([RFC 8305][rfc_8305]) for IPv4+IPv6 networks.** It attempts
both IPv6 and IPv4 connections concurrently, keeping whichever connects first.

**We’ve improved our Kotlin APIs.** You can skip the builder:

```kotlin