* Each response body is backed by a limited resource like a socket (live network responses) or
 * an open file (for cached responses). Failing to close the response body will leak resources and
 * may ultimately cause the application to slow down or crash.
 *
 * Both this class and [Response] implement [Closeable]. Closing a response simply
 * closes its response body. If you invoke [Call.execute] or implement [Callback.onResponse] you

    assertThat(UnsignedLongs.remainder(0xfffffffffffffffeL, 2)).isEqualTo(0);
    assertThat(UnsignedLongs.remainder(0xfffffffffffffffeL, 5)).isEqualTo(4);
  }

  @GwtIncompatible // Too slow in GWT (~3min fully optimized)
  public void testDivideRemainderEuclideanProperty() {
    // Use a seed so that the test is deterministic:
    Random r = new Random(0L);
    for (int i = 0; i < 1000000; i++) {

	// WorkerMinLimit min number of workers per node for "slow" mode
	WorkerMinLimit = 50

	// WorkerAutoDefault is default number of workers for "auto" mode
	WorkerAutoDefault = 100

	// MRFWorkerMaxLimit max number of mrf workers per node for "fast" mode
	MRFWorkerMaxLimit = 8

	// MRFWorkerMinLimit min number of mrf workers per node for "slow" mode
	MRFWorkerMinLimit = 2

         * problems can exist with methods like FutureTask.done(), not to mention slow calls to
         * Thread.interrupt() (as discussed in InterruptibleTask). At the end of the day, it's
         * unlikely that cancel() will be slow, so we can probably get away with calling it while
         * holding a lock. Still, it would be nice to avoid somehow.
         */

    HashTestUtils.assertInvariants(Hashing.fingerprint2011());
    assertEquals("Hashing.fingerprint2011()", Hashing.fingerprint2011().toString());
  }

  @AndroidIncompatible // slow TODO(cpovirk): Maybe just reduce iterations under Android.
  public void testGoodFastHash() {
    for (int i = 1; i < 200; i += 17) {
      HashFunction hasher = Hashing.goodFastHash(i);
      assertTrue(hasher.bits() >= i);

    try {
      // if waiting works, this should get stuck
      Queues.drain(q, new ArrayList<>(), 1, MAX_VALUE, NANOSECONDS);
      fail();
    } catch (InterruptedException expected) {
      // we indeed waited; a slow thread had enough time to interrupt us
    }
  }

  // same as above; uninterruptible version
  @SuppressWarnings("ThreadPriorityCheck") // TODO: b/175898629 - Consider onSpinWait.

// and returns nil.
func osMkdirAll(dirPath string, perm os.FileMode, baseDir string) error {
	if baseDir != "" {
		if strings.HasPrefix(baseDir, dirPath) {
			return nil
		}
	}

	// Slow path: make sure parent exists and then call Mkdir for path.
	i := len(dirPath)
	for i > 0 && os.IsPathSeparator(dirPath[i-1]) { // Skip trailing path separator.
		i--
	}

	j := i

    assertThat(server.takeRequest().exchangeIndex).isEqualTo(1)
  }

  @Tag("Slow")
  @Test
  fun successfulExpectContinuePermitsConnectionReuseWithHttp2() {
    enableProtocol(Protocol.HTTP_2)
    successfulExpectContinuePermitsConnectionReuse()
  }

  @Tag("Slow")
  @Test
  fun unsuccessfulExpectContinuePreventsConnectionReuse() {
    server.enqueue(MockResponse())

    val extraParameters: String = "",
) {
    PER_COMMIT(
        displayName = "Performance Regression Test",
        timeout = 420,
        channel = "commits",
    ),
    PER_DAY(
        displayName = "Slow Performance Regression Test",
        timeout = 420,
        channel = "commits",
    ),
    PER_WEEK(
        displayName = "Performance Experiment",
        timeout = 420,
        channel = "experiments",

         * problems can exist with methods like FutureTask.done(), not to mention slow calls to
         * Thread.interrupt() (as discussed in InterruptibleTask). At the end of the day, it's
         * unlikely that cancel() will be slow, so we can probably get away with calling it while
         * holding a lock. Still, it would be nice to avoid somehow.
         */