* replacing {@code Booleans.contains(array, true)} with {@code !bitSet.isEmpty()} and {@code
   * Booleans.contains(array, false)} with {@code bitSet.nextClearBit(0) == sizeOfBitSet}.
   *
   * @param array an array of {@code boolean} values, possibly empty
   * @param target a primitive {@code boolean} value
   * @return {@code true} if {@code array[i] == target} for some value of {@code i}
   */

   * replacing {@code Booleans.contains(array, true)} with {@code !bitSet.isEmpty()} and {@code
   * Booleans.contains(array, false)} with {@code bitSet.nextClearBit(0) == sizeOfBitSet}.
   *
   * @param array an array of {@code boolean} values, possibly empty
   * @param target a primitive {@code boolean} value
   * @return {@code true} if {@code array[i] == target} for some value of {@code i}
   */

   *
   * <p>Java 8 introduced a new method {@code getAnnotatedBounds()} in the {@link TypeVariable}
   * interface, whose return type {@code AnnotatedType[]} is also new in Java 8. As of 2025, Android
   * has not added {@link AnnotatedType}. That means that we cannot implement that interface in
   * source code in a way that will compile on both Java and Android. If we include the {@code

Agora vamos **refatorar** este app um pouco para aumentar a **segurança** e **versatilidade**.

Se você verificar o app anterior, na interface você pode ver que, até agora, ele permite que o cliente decida o `id` do `Hero` a ser criado. 😱

 * i.e. {@code if (key1.equals(key2))} then {@code striped.get(key1) == striped.get(key2)} (assuming
 * {@link Object#hashCode()} is correctly implemented for the keys). Note that if {@code key1} is
 * <strong>not</strong> equal to {@code key2}, it is <strong>not</strong> guaranteed that {@code
 * striped.get(key1) != striped.get(key2)}; the elements might nevertheless be mapped to the same

   * String.class}, then {@code new TypeResolver().where(formal, actual)} will {@linkplain
   * #resolveType resolve} {@code ParameterizedType List<T>} to {@code List<String>}, and resolve
   * {@code Map<T, Something>} to {@code Map<String, Something>} etc. Similarly, {@code formal} and
   * {@code actual} can be {@code Map<K, V>} and {@code Map<String, Integer>} respectively, or they

 *   <dt>From the IPv6 reserved documentation prefix ({@code 2001:db8::/32}), {@code "2001:db8::1"}.
 *   <dd>{@code 20 01 0d b8 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01}
 *   <dt>An IPv6 "IPv4 compatible" (or "compat") address, {@code "::192.168.0.1"}.
 *   <dd>{@code 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 c0 a8 00 01}
 *   <dt>An IPv6 "IPv4 mapped" address, {@code "::ffff:192.168.0.1"}.
 *   <dd>{@code 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ff ff c0 a8 00 01}
 * </dl>
 *

   *     found in the map.
   */
  protected abstract V getValueNotInPopulatedMap() throws UnsupportedOperationException;

  /**
   * Constructor that assigns {@code supportsIteratorRemove} the same value as {@code
   * supportsRemove}.
   */
  protected MapInterfaceTest(
      boolean allowsNullKeys,
      boolean allowsNullValues,
      boolean supportsPut,
      boolean supportsRemove,

    responses returned by OkHttp itself, and it was an old mistake to permit
    application code to omit a message.

 *  The challenge's scheme and realm are now non-null. If you are calling
    `new Challenge(scheme, realm)` you must provide non-null values. These were
    never null in challenges created by OkHttp, but could have been null in
    application code that creates challenges.

            } catch (final SmbException smbe) {
                // Retrying only makes sense if the invalid parameter is an tree id. If we have a stale file descriptor
                // retrying make no sense, as it will never become available again.
                if (params.contains(RequestParam.NO_RETRY)
                        || !(smbe.getCause() instanceof TransportException) && smbe.getNtStatus() != NtStatus.NT_STATUS_INVALID_PARAMETER) {