*
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> This method, which reencodes the input before processing it, is useful only
   * for cross-language compatibility. For other use cases, prefer {@link #putUnencodedChars}, which
   * is faster, produces the same output across Java releases, and processes every {@code char} in
   * the input, even if some are invalid.
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue

    CharArrayDecorator(char[] @Nullable [] replacements) {
      this.replacements = replacements;
      this.replaceLength = replacements.length;
    }

    /*
     * Overriding escape method to be slightly faster for this decorator. We test the replacements
     * array directly, saving a method call.
     */
    @Override
    public String escape(String s) {
      int slen = s.length();

    }
  }

  /**
   * A trust manager for Android applications that customize the trust manager.
   *
   * This class exploits knowledge of Android implementation details. This class is potentially
   * much faster to initialize than [BasicTrustRootIndex] because it doesn't need to load and
   * index trusted CA certificates.
   */
  internal data class CustomTrustRootIndex(
    private val trustManager: X509TrustManager,

image/jpeg                     jpeg jpg jpe     # JPG image file
image/png                      png              # Portable Network Graphics
image/tiff                     tiff tif         # TIFF image file
image/x-cmu-raster             ras              #
image/x-portable-anymap        pnm              #
image/x-portable-bitmap        pbm              #
image/x-portable-graymap       pgm              #

		return metaCacheEntriesSorted{o: m}
	}
	sort.Slice(m, m.less)
	return metaCacheEntriesSorted{o: m}
}

// isSorted returns whether the objects are sorted.
// This is usually orders of magnitude faster than actually sorting.
func (m metaCacheEntries) isSorted() bool {
	return sort.SliceIsSorted(m, m.less)
}

// shallowClone will create a shallow clone of the array objects,

 * iterators that don't support {@code remove()}. Otherwise, all optional operations are supported.
 * Null row keys, columns keys, and values are not supported.
 *
 * <p>Lookups by row key are often faster than lookups by column key, because the data is stored in
 * a {@code Map<R, Map<C, V>>}. A method call like {@code column(columnKey).get(rowKey)} still runs

 * iterators that don't support {@code remove()}. Otherwise, all optional operations are supported.
 * Null row keys, columns keys, and values are not supported.
 *
 * <p>Lookups by row key are often faster than lookups by column key, because the data is stored in
 * a {@code Map<R, Map<C, V>>}. A method call like {@code column(columnKey).get(rowKey)} still runs

   * moved to index "distance", and the element at index {@code i} ends up at index {@code (distance
   * + i) mod array.length}. This is equivalent to {@code Collections.rotate(Floats.asList(array),
   * distance)}, but is considerably faster and avoids allocation and garbage collection.
   *
   * <p>The provided "distance" may be negative, which will rotate left.
   *
   * @since 32.0.0
   */
  public static void rotate(float[] array, int distance) {

          CharStreams.copy(reader, sb);
        }
        return sb.toString();
      }
    },
    // It really seems like this should be faster than TO_BYTE_ARRAY_NEW_STRING.  But it just isn't
    // my best guess is that the jdk authors have spent more time optimizing that callpath than this

 *  **Okio dependency added.** OkHttp now depends on
    [Okio](https://github.com/square/okio), an I/O library that makes it easier
    to access, store and process data. Using this library internally makes OkHttp
    faster while consuming less memory. You can write a `RequestBody` as an Okio
    `BufferedSink` and a `ResponseBody` as an Okio `BufferedSource`. Standard