private static final Logger logger = Logger.getLogger(Platform.class.getName());
  private static final PatternCompiler patternCompiler = loadPatternCompiler();

  private Platform() {}

  static CharMatcher precomputeCharMatcher(CharMatcher matcher) {
    return matcher.precomputedInternal();
  }

  static <T extends Enum<T>> Optional<T> getEnumIfPresent(Class<T> enumClass, String value) {

import jsinterop.annotations.JsMethod;
import jsinterop.annotations.JsType;
import org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable;

/** @author Jesse Wilson */
final class Platform {
  static CharMatcher precomputeCharMatcher(CharMatcher matcher) {
    // CharMatcher.precomputed() produces CharMatchers that are maybe a little
    // faster (and that's debatable), but definitely more memory-hungry. We're

@GwtCompatible(emulated = true)
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
final class Platform {
  private static final PatternCompiler patternCompiler = loadPatternCompiler();

  private Platform() {}

  static CharMatcher precomputeCharMatcher(CharMatcher matcher) {
    return matcher.precomputedInternal();
  }

  static <T extends Enum<T>> Optional<T> getEnumIfPresent(Class<T> enumClass, String value) {

   * precomputed matcher is faster, but it certainly consumes more memory, which doesn't seem like a
   * worthwhile tradeoff in a browser.
   */
  public CharMatcher precomputed() {
    return Platform.precomputeCharMatcher(this);
  }

  private static final int DISTINCT_CHARS = Character.MAX_VALUE - Character.MIN_VALUE + 1;

  /**

   * precomputed matcher is faster, but it certainly consumes more memory, which doesn't seem like a
   * worthwhile tradeoff in a browser.
   */
  public CharMatcher precomputed() {
    return Platform.precomputeCharMatcher(this);
  }

  private static final int DISTINCT_CHARS = Character.MAX_VALUE - Character.MIN_VALUE + 1;

  /**